Thursday, September 3, 2026

Out of Africa theory debunked

 


 

“Australian historian Greg Jefferys explains that, "The whole 'Out of Africa' myth has its roots in the mainstream academic campaign in the 1990′s to remove the concept of Race. When I did my degree they all spent a lot of time on the

'Out of Africa' thing but it's been completely disproved by genetics.

Mainstream still hold on to it".”

  

Debunked: 'Out of Africa thing completely disproved by genetics'


Atlanteangardens.blogspot.com.au
Sat, 03 May 2014 06:37 UTC

 

Scientific evidence refuting the theory of modern humanity's African genesis is common knowledge among those familiar with the most recent scientific papers on the human Genome, Mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosomes. Regrettably, within mainstream press and academia circles, there seems to be a conspicuous - and dare we say it - deliberate vacuum when it comes to reporting news of these recent studies and their obvious implications.

 

Australian historian Greg Jefferys explains that, "The whole 'Out of Africa' myth has its roots in the mainstream academic campaign in the 1990′s to remove the concept of Race. When I did my degree they all spent a lot of time on the 'Out of Africa' thing but it's been completely disproved by genetics. Mainstream still hold on to it."

 

It did begin the early 90's. And the academics most responsible for cementing both the Out-of Africa theory and the complementary common ancestral African mother - given the name of "Eve" - in the public arena and nearly every curriculum, were Professors Alan C. Wilson and Rebecca L. Cann.


In their defense, the authors of this paper were fully aware that genealogy is not in any way linked to geography, and that their placement of Eve in Africa was an assumption, never an assertion.

 

A very recent paper on Y-chromosomes published in 2012, (Re-Examing the "Out of Africa" Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasians) in the Light of DNA Genealogy written by Anatole A. Klyosov and Igor L. Rozhanski) only confirms the denial of any African ancestry in non-Africans, and strongly supports the existence of a "common ancestor" who "would not necessarily be in Africa. In fact, it was never proven that he lived in Africa."

 

Central to results of this extensive examination of haplogroups (7,556) was the absence of any African genes.

 

So lacking was the sampling of African genetic involvement, the researchers stated in their introduction that, "the finding that the Europeoid haplogroups did not descend from "African" haplogroups A or B is supported by the fact that bearers of the Europeoid, as well as all non-African groups do not carry either SNI's M91, P97, M31, P82, M23, M114, P262".

With the haplogroups not present in any African genes and an absence of dozens of African genetic markers, it is very difficult nigh on impossible to sustain any link to Africa. The researchers are adamant that their extensive study "offers evidence to re-examine the validity of the Out-of-Africa concept".

 

They see no genetic proof substantiating an African precedence in the Homo sapien tree, and maintain that "a more plausible interpretation might have been that both current Africans and non-Africans descended separately from a more ancient common ancestor, thus forming a proverbial fork".

 

We regard the claim of "a more plausible explanation" as a gross understatement, since there is absolutely nothing plausibly African turning up in any test tubes.

 

In fact, the researchers made note of their repeated absence stating "not one non-African participant out of more than 400 individuals in the Project tested positive to any of thirteen 'African' sub-clades of haplogroup A". The only remaining uncertainty relates to the identity of this "more ancient common ancestor". All that can be stated with confidence is that humanity's ancestor did not reside in Africa.

….

 

 

Wednesday, September 2, 2026

The Virgin and Immanuel

 



by

 Damien F. Mackey


“All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: 

“The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel” (which means “God with us”)”.

 Matthew 1:22-23

  

Introduction

 

Those who insist that this text of Matthew is a literal fulfilment of Isaiah 7:14 are doomed to failure.

Try as one may, the literal details in the ancient text of Isaiah 7 just cannot be fitted (or fit, as is popular today) to what took place at the time of the Incarnation and Nativity of Jesus Christ.

 

The attentive reader of Isaiah (who knows a bit of history) will be aware that the historical setting for the ancient story is the C8th BC, when an ambitious Syrian king, Rezin, bent upon creating a Greater Syria (much like Benjamin Netanyahu, today, with his Greater Israel), had joined forces with the king of Israel, Pekah.

And a focal aim of this coalition was to conquer and rule Judah (Jerusalem) wherein king Ahaz presently reigned (7:1). 

 

In the midst of all this there arrives the great prophet Isaiah, empowered by the Lord to show a miraculous sign to king Ahaz, in order to strengthen him to turn to the Lord in this time of trial, when the hearts of he and the nation of Judah were said to be “shaken, as the trees of the forest are shaken by the wind” (7:2).  

 

Unfortunately, though, Ahaz had determined that it will be ‘my way or the highway’. He will reject Isaiah’s (the Lord’s) offer and will turn instead for help to the mighty, “the King of Assyria” (7:17), Tiglath-pileser.

 

This will prompt Isaiah, who had initially been most tolerant and respectful towards the king, to switch from referring to the Lord as “your God” (7:11), to “my God” (7:13).

 

King Ahaz, who will choose Assyrian overlordship over divine Lordship, was no more, therefore, entitled to be regarded as one belonging to the Lord.

 

Obviously, none of this - C8th BC; Syro-Ephraïmite civil war; Assyrian king, Ahaz - can have any literal relationship whatsoever to the Infancy era of Jesus Christ: by then, king Ahaz was long dead and the kingdom of Assyria had ceased to exist!

 

But even the more personal details pertaining to Isaiah cannot be force-fitted to Matthew 1:22-23.

 

The Isaian family

 

Isaiah and his family are merely types of the greater reality that is to come.

 

Isaiah can remind one typologically of God the Father, with his future son, Immanuel.

An un-asked for sign will be given to Ahaz and his House, the sign of Immanuel.

 

But the literal Isaiah already had one other son, Shear-jashub, with whom he met Ahaz (7:3): Then the Lord said to Isaiah, ‘Go out, you and your son Shear-Jashub, to meet Ahaz at the end of the aqueduct of the Upper Pool, on the road to the Launderer’s Field’.”

This text can have no literal New Testament correspondence.

 

Moreover, “Immanuel”, which will be the personal name of Isaiah’s second son, “… will call him Immanuel”, was not the personal name of the future Messiah, which was “Jesus” (Matthew 1:21): ‘You shall name him Jesus’.

 

            The Woman

 

Isaiah’s wife is described by the much-discussed Hebrew word, almah (עַלְמָה), which can apparently mean “young woman (of marriageable age)”, or, indeed, “virgin” - while the accompanying verb, harah (הָרָה֙), means to be with child.

It seems, however, to be set in the past tense.

 

Matthew the Evangelist, using a typically Hebrew pesher interpretation of this text - and in light of what he knew that the Holy Spirit had intended in the greater scheme of things - will take the almah in its legitimate translation as “virgin”, and will make of the verb, harah, the future tense: “The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel”. 

 

But that, as we have found, cannot be a literal interpretation of Isaiah 7:14, which “retains its own intrinsic value” (The Catechism of the Catholic Church, # 129).

 

Unlike as was the case with the Holy Family, one son (Shear-jashub) had already been born, and was actually present there (standing or being carried) with his prophet father, as Isaiah approached King Ahaz. 

And, if Isaiah’s wife was also the mother of Shear-jashub, then, obviously, she could not have been a virgin.

 

In a previous article:

 

Was Hosea’s boy-child, Lo-Ammi, Isaiah’s famous son, Immanuel?

 

(7) Was Hosea's boy-child, Lo-Ammi, Isaiah's famous son, Immanuel?

 

in which I folded, as one, Isaiah and the prophet Hosea, the woman, Gomer, became the mother of all of the following four children, three boys and a girl:

 

Shear-jashub = Jezreel;

Lo-ruhamah (girl);

Immanuel = Lo-ammi;

Maher-shalal-hash-baz

 

Immanuel was, in fact, her third child.

 

Yet, the Messiah, a Divine Person, was far more perfectly the fulfilment of the name, Immanuel, “God is with us”, than any Old Testament, or even New Testament character could possibly hope to have been.

 


 

 

Friday, August 28, 2026

Zebedee inscription in Capernaum

 


 

“Numerous stone artifacts found at the site include olive presses and millstones, dishes and craters (large bowls for mixing wine), and the earliest known

pictorial representation of the Ark of the Covenant”.

Mike Mason

 

In my recent article:

 

Whence that name, Capernaum?

 (2) Whence that name, Capernaum?

 

I suggested, following Charles Boutflower, that the prophet Isaiah (who is my Nahum), he and his family – a type of the Holy Family – had fled to Galilee to escape the wrath of king Ahaz of Judah. Instead of Boutflower’s Nazareth in Galilee, though, I had opted for Capernaum, allowing for the place to be named after a Nahum, thus Kfar Naum (כְּפַר נַחוּם), literally, ‘Nahum’s village’.

 

And further, since (Isaiah) Nahum was also Jonah (cf. Tobit 14:4), I had proceeded to suggest, in my follow-up article:

 

Were any Old Testament prophets from Galilee?

 

(2) Were any Old Testament prophets from Galilee?

 

that Jonah’s Gath-hepher (2 Kings 14:25) must have been the original name of the place, before it was re-named after the prophet Nahum (Jonah).

 

The Hebrew name, Gath-hepher (גַּת הַחֵפֶר), is apparently associated with “winepress”, “winepress of the well”, or “winepress of the digging”: 

Topical Bible: Gath-Hepher

 

As we read above: “Numerous stone artifacts found at the site include olive presses and millstones, dishes and craters (large bowls for mixing wine) …”.

It would be an appropriate site to have prompted Jesus to utter (Luke 17:2): ‘It would be better to be thrown into the sea with a millstone hung around your neck than to cause one of these little ones to fall into sin’.

 

And that leads us seamlessly into this insightful article by Dr. Noel Rabinowitz:

Millstones Made in Capernaum – Dr. Noel Rabinowitz

 

 

Millstones Made in Capernaum

 

Bible interpreters have much to say concerning Yeshua’s [Jesus’s] teaching about the humble status of children in Matthew 18:1-6 but they usually overlook where that event takes place – a detail that is actually quite important to the story. After deflating the disciples’ ambitions for power and prestige in the Kingdom, Yeshua follows up with a stern warning: “But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea” (v.6).

 

We know from Matthew 17:24 that Yeshua and his disciples had returned to Capernaum and this detail enables us to interpret Yeshua’s words here with even greater clarity. Capernaum is located on the northern shoreline of the Sea of Galilee and sits on a bed of basalt rock, the remains of a long extinct volcano. Fishing was obviously the major industry at Capernaum but it wasn’t the only industry – the basalt provided Capernaum with nutrient-rich farming soil in which to grow high quality grains. The abundance of basalt, however, made Capernaum home to a third industry, namely the manufacture of heavy-duty agricultural tools such as olive presses, household griding tools and industrial millstones.

 

Excavators found a large quantity of unfinished tools at Capernaum – many more than the residents of the village could have possibly needed, indicating that these tools were manufactured for sale.

 

Workman made small household grinding stones as well as industrial millstones which were much larger and much heavier than the household version.

 

The bottom part of the industrial millstone was cone-shaped and sat on the ground, pointy-end up. The top part, which rested on top of the cone, was shaped like an hourglass with what looked like a stone belt at the waste of the hourglass. A wooden log was inserted into the “belt” and turned by a donkey. Grain was poured into the top and ground as the donkey turned the stone.

 

English Bibles typically translate the Greek phrase μύλος νικς (mulos onikos) something along the lines of ‘great millstone” (ESV), “large millstone” (NIV), “heavy millstone” (NASB); “huge milestone” (NET) or simply “millstone” (KJV). The Greek phrase, however, literally means “millstone of a donkey.” Yeshua was clearly referring to the hourglass-shaped – and extremely heavy – upper section of an industrial millstone.

 

Now, Yeshua’s warning becomes extraordinarily vivid! He and his disciples were in Capernaum with the Sea of Galilee in plain view. Perhaps they were even standing along the lake’s shoreline when Yeshua made this statement. And they had no doubt walked past the millstone factory many times. It wasn’t hard for them to visualize the horrific death of someone with an industrial-grade basalt grinder tied around his neck sinking to the bottom of the lake. The fate of those who cause one of Yeshua’s disciples to sin is intended as a warning for us all.


Capernaum (Chapter 18 of Jesus: His Story In Stone)

Capernaum (Chapter 18 of Jesus: His Story In Stone)

 

Posted on August 31, 2015 by Mike Mason

 

Leaving Nazareth, He went to live in Capernaum. –Mt 4:13

 

The ancient village of Capernaum (which means town of Nahum) was located on the north shore of the Sea of Galilee, some three miles west of where the upper Jordan River flows into the lake from the northern mountains.

 

In Jesus’ day its population was about 1500, small compared to several much larger cities on the lake. But Capernaum was strategically important for being on a primary trade route known as the Via Maris (Way of the Sea) that carried traffic from the interior along the top of the lake toward the Mediterranean coast. In Capernaum Jesus called five of His disciples: the four fishermen Peter, Andrew, James and John, and the tax collector Matthew. In fact there were “many tax collectors” stationed here, showing that this was a significant financial center, as well as hosting a detachment of Roman soldiers (Mt 8:5-13).

 

Ruins of Capernaum

 

Discovered by the explorer Edward Robinson in 1838, the ruins of this village reveal a network of adjoining houses built of undressed and unmortared basalt blocks, reinforced with stones and mud. A typical single-story house, accomodating two or more kindred families, consisted of small rooms with cobbled floors arranged around an open courtyard, with stone steps leading up to a roof made of light wooden beams, thatch, and packed dirt.

 

Numerous stone artifacts found at the site include olive presses and millstones, dishes and craters (large bowls for mixing wine), and the earliest known pictorial representation of the Ark of the Covenant. The second photograph shows another interesting discovery, the so-called Zebedee inscription which, though it dates from the fourth century, mentions the family name of the father of James and John, “the sons of Zebedee” (Mk 10:35). 

 

The full inscription reads: “Alphaeus the son of Zebedee the son of John made this column. May it be for him a blessing ...”.

 

The Zebedee Pillar

 

It was here in Capernaum that Jesus chose to establish headquarters for the early part of His ministry. Matthew refers to it as Jesus’ “own town” (9:1) and many chapters of the gospels are set here. Outstanding miracles of healing were performed in Capernaum, including that of the man with a shriveled hand (Mk 3:1-6), the centurion’s servant (Mt 8:5-13), a demonized man (Mk 1:21-89), and a paralytic (Mk 2:1-12). Regarding the latter story, the photograph shows how easy it would have been for the paralytic’s four friends to escape the crowds by climbing over the rooftops of the abutting houses, digging through the light thatch, and lowering their friend directly into the courtyard of the house where Jesus was teaching.

 

Note that all these miracles contain important elements beyond the miracle itself. In the case of the paralytic, Jesus made a public demonstration of forgiving his sins, thus drawing the accusation of blasphemy from the teachers of the law. Similarly, the man with a shriveled hand was healed on the sabbath, again rousing his opponents’ ire. As for the demonized man, when the demon testified loudly to knowing who Jesus was —“the Holy One of God!”— Jesus told him sternly to be quiet. In each case, it seems, the real point was not the miracle, amazing though it was, but the explosive secret of Jesus’ true identity. As the Pharisees complained, “Who can forgive sins but God alone?” (Mk 2:7)

 

In the end, despite such tremendous works of power, and despite the amazing blessing of having the Son of God living in their midst, Capernaum rejected its famous rabbi, compelling Jesus in turn to reject the town: “And you, Capernaum, will you be lifted up to the skies? No, you will go down to the depths…. It will be more bearable for Sodom on the day of judgment than for you” (Mt 11:23-4).

 

(Photos by Karen Mason)

 

Sunday, August 23, 2026

Christological significance of Nahum



 

“The “good tidings” of Nahum 1:15 anticipate the gospel itself:

the announcement of peace through the victory of God over evil.

Christ, the ultimate conqueror, defeats not earthly empires

but the greater tyranny of sin and death”.

  

We read at:

Exploring Nahum: Justice and Hope in the Fall of Nineveh

 

The Book of Nahum

 

The book of Nahum is a vivid, poetic, and uncompromising proclamation of divine justice. It announces the fall of Nineveh—the proud capital of the Assyrian Empire—and in doing so, reveals the holiness, sovereignty, and vengeance of God against evil.

 

Often called the “Book of the Burden of Nineveh,” Nahum stands as a sequel to Jonah. Where Jonah reveals God’s mercy toward a repentant city, Nahum reveals His justice toward a city that has returned to violence and arrogance. It is a book that exalts the moral order of the universe, assuring believers that though wickedness may prosper for a time, the Lord will not allow it to endure forever.

 

I. Authorship and Historical Setting

 

Nahum (“Comfort” or “Consolation”) was a prophet from Elkosh, perhaps a small village in Judah.  [Mackey’s comment: Actually, it was Ali Qosh near Nineveh. Nahum, who was Jonah (cf. Tobit 14:4), a prophet from the tribe of Simeon, tarried for a time in Nineveh]. His name fittingly reflects the nature of his message: a comfort to God’s oppressed people and a warning to their cruel oppressors. Beyond this, little is known of his life,

 

[Mackey’s comment: But see my articles, e.g.:

 

De-coding Jonah

 

(8) De-coding Jonah

 

God can raise up prophets at will - even from a shepherd of Simeon

 

(8) God can raise up prophets at will - even from a shepherd of Simeon

 

but his words reveal a man of deep theological conviction and poetic skill.

The prophecy likely dates between 663 and 612 B.C.

 

[Mackey’s comment: See my articles. Nahum-Jonah died well before these dates. Nahum’s No-Amon does not refer too Thebes, as is commonly thought].

 

The earlier date is set by Nahum’s reference to the fall of No-Amon (Thebes) in Egypt (3:8–10), which occurred in 663 B.C., and the later by the destruction of Nineveh itself in 612 B.C. Thus, Nahum wrote sometime in the middle of the seventh century B.C., during the reign of Manasseh or Josiah.

 

This was a period of great distress for Judah. The Assyrian Empire, having dominated the Near East for over a century, had conquered Israel (the northern kingdom) in 722 B.C. and subjected Judah to vassalage and humiliation. Assyria’s cruelty was infamous: its kings boasted of massacres, enslavement, and terror as instruments of control.

 

Nineveh, the empire’s glittering capital, represented the height of human pride and violence. Yet, amid this darkness, Nahum’s message shines as a declaration that God’s justice would prevail: the oppressor would be destroyed and the faithful would find comfort in the Lord’s righteous reign.

 

II. Structure and Literary Design

 

Nahum is one of the most beautifully structured prophetic books, combining artistry with theological force. Its three chapters form a tightly woven prophetic poem that moves from the declaration of divine character to the vivid depiction of Nineveh’s downfall:

 

 

  1. The Majesty and Justice of God (Chapter 1)

 

    • The book opens with a majestic theophany: a vision of God as a jealous, avenging, and sovereign Lord.
    • He is slow to anger yet great in power, and He will not acquit the wicked (1:3).
    • The chapter serves as both a psalm of praise and a prelude to judgment, contrasting the destruction of God’s enemies with the peace promised to His people: “The LORD is good, a strong hold in the day of trouble; and he knoweth them that trust in him” (1:7).

 

  1. The Siege and Destruction of Nineveh (Chapter 2)

 

    • The prophet describes Nineveh’s impending fall in striking military imagery: chariots racing, shields gleaming red, walls breached, and the city plundered.
    • The once-mighty empire is reduced to chaos, its wealth carried away, its people fleeing in terror.
    • The language is both poetic and prophetic, emphasizing that the devastation is not merely the result of human warfare but of divine retribution: “Behold, I am against thee, saith the LORD of hosts” (2:13).

 

  1. The Reasons for Judgment and Its Finality (Chapter 3)

 

    • Nahum details Nineveh’s sins: bloodshed, lies, sorcery, arrogance, and idolatry.
    • The “bloody city” (3:1) that had enslaved nations will itself be shamed, stripped, and left desolate.
    • The prophecy concludes with a note of finality: “There is no healing of thy bruise; thy wound is grievous” (3:19).
    • The nations, once terrified by Assyria’s power, will rejoice at her fall: “All that hear the bruit of thee shall clap the hands over thee.”

 

III. Themes and Theology

 

Nahum is a study in the attributes of God revealed through judgment. Its themes are both sobering and strengthening, calling readers to reverence before the justice and sovereignty of the Lord.

 

  • The Justice and Holiness of God:
    Nahum affirms that God’s justice is neither arbitrary nor cruel. His wrath is the necessary response of holiness to sin. “The LORD is slow to anger” (1:3), yet when patience ends, His judgment is absolute and righteous.
  • The Sovereignty of God Over Nations:
    The downfall of Nineveh demonstrates that no empire—no matter how powerful—can stand against the purposes of God. Nations rise and fall under His decree (cf. Daniel 2:21).
  • The Certainty of Judgment:
    Assyria’s destruction was not theoretical but historical. The prophecy’s accuracy underscores that divine warnings are not empty threats. The moral order of the world is upheld by a God who acts.
  • The Comfort of the Righteous:
    For Judah, Nahum’s message was not merely about vengeance but about deliverance. “Behold upon the mountains the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that publisheth peace!” (1:15). God’s justice against evil is the foundation of His people’s hope.
  • The Danger of Pride and Cruelty:
    Nineveh’s arrogance, cruelty, and self-deification stand as warnings to every generation. The same sins that destroyed Assyria—pride, violence, deceit—remain the downfall of nations and individuals who defy God’s authority.

 

IV. Historical and Apologetic Considerations

 

Archaeological discoveries have confirmed Nahum’s prophecy with striking accuracy. Excavations at Nineveh reveal evidence of a violent destruction consistent with the Babylonian-[sic] Median conquest of 612 B.C.: massive fires, toppled walls, and widespread devastation. Once considered impregnable, Nineveh vanished beneath the sands of history, just as Nahum foretold: “Nineveh is laid waste: who will bemoan her?” (3:7).

 

Nahum’s oracles also correct any misconception that God is indifferent to evil. His destruction of Nineveh, long delayed since Jonah’s time, shows that divine patience is not permissiveness. God’s mercy and justice are not contradictory but complementary. He is merciful in warning and just in fulfilling His word.

 

V. Christological Significance

 

While Nahum does not mention the Messiah directly, it contributes profoundly to the biblical revelation of God’s character, a revelation ultimately fulfilled in Christ. The divine attributes displayed in Nahum—justice, wrath, and steadfast love—find perfect harmony in the person of Jesus.

 

At the cross, God’s wrath against sin and His mercy toward sinners meet in perfect balance. The same Lord who judged Nineveh bore judgment on behalf of His people. The “good tidings” of Nahum 1:15 anticipate the gospel itself: the announcement of peace through the victory of God over evil. Christ, the ultimate conqueror, defeats not earthly empires but the greater tyranny of sin and death.

 

VI. Practical and Devotional Application

 

Nahum calls believers to trust the righteousness of God in times of injustice and oppression.

 

It assures the faithful that evil will not reign forever, and that God’s timing, though mysterious, is always perfect. In an age when moral relativism blurs distinctions between right and wrong, Nahum reminds us that divine justice is absolute and inescapable.

 

The book also warns against pride, self-reliance, and cruelty. Nations and individuals alike are accountable to the Lord of hosts. True security lies not in fortresses or wealth but in humility before God and faith in His Word. For those who trust Him, Nahum’s stern message becomes a source of deep comfort: “The LORD is good, a strong hold in the day of trouble; and he knoweth them that trust in him” (1:7).

 

VII. Conclusion

 

The prophecy of Nahum is both terrifying and consoling: a thunderclap of judgment and a whisper of hope. It declares that the moral universe is not chaotic: God reigns, and He will vindicate His righteousness. Nineveh’s ruins stand as a monument to the truth that no power can withstand His justice.

 

For the believer, Nahum offers this enduring assurance: the same God who brings down the proud also lifts up the humble. The Lord’s vengeance against evil is the foundation of everlasting peace for His people. The book closes, not in despair, but in triumph: the wicked fall and the righteous rest secure in the justice of their Redeemer.