Showing posts with label Pope Benedict XVI What is Truth?. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pope Benedict XVI What is Truth?. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 4, 2015

Chesterton (1874-1936)

 

G. K. Chesterton (1874-1936) Author Page | Ignatius Insight


Articles By and About G. K. Chesterton
Ignatius Press Books about G. K. Chesterton
Books by G. K. Chesterton



G. K. Chesterton: “Who is this guy and why haven’t I heard of him?”



A pithy bio of G.K. Chesterton by Dale Ahlquist, President, American Chesterton Society
I’ve heard the question more than once. It is asked by people who have just started to discover G.K. Chesterton. They have begun reading a Chesterton book, or perhaps have seen an issue of Gilbert! Magazine, or maybe they’ve only encountered a series of pithy quotations that marvelously articulate some forgotten bit of common sense. They ask the question with a mixture of wonder, gratitude and . . . resentment. They are amazed by what they have discovered. They are thankful to have discovered it. And they are almost angry that it has taken so long for them to make the discovery.
“Who is this guy. . .?”


Gilbert Keith Chesterton (1874-1936) cannot be summed up in one sentence. Nor in one paragraph. In fact, in spite of the fine biographies that have been written of him, (and his Autobiography) he has never been captured between the covers of one book. But rather than waiting to separate the goats from the sheep, let’s just come right out and say it: G.K. Chesterton was the best writer of the twentieth century. He said something about everything and he said it better than anybody else. But he was no mere wordsmith. He was very good at expressing himself, but more importantly, he had something very good to express. The reason he was the greatest writer of the twentieth century was because he was also the greatest thinker of the twentieth century.
Born in London, Chesterton was educated at St. Paul’s, but never went to college. He went to art school. In 1900, he was asked to contribute a few magazine articles on art criticism, and went on to become one of the most prolific writers of all time. He wrote a hundred books, contributions to 200 more, hundreds of poems, including the epic Ballad of the White Horse, five plays, five novels, and some two hundred short stories, including a popular series featuring the priest-detective, Father Brown. In spite of his literary accomplishments, he considered himself primarily a journalist. He wrote over 4000 newspaper essays, including 30 years worth of weekly columns for the Illustrated London News, and 13 years of weekly columns for the Daily News. He also edited his own newspaper, G.K.’s Weekly. (To put it into perspective, four thousand essays is the equivalent of writing an essay a day, every day, for 11 years. If you’re not impressed, try it some time. But they have to be good essays, all of them, as funny as they are serious, and as readable and rewarding a century after you’ve written them.)
Chesterton was equally at ease with literary and social criticism, history, politics, economics, philosophy, and theology. His style is unmistakable, always marked by humility, consistency, paradox, wit, and wonder. His writing remains as timely and as timeless today as when it first appeared, even though much of it was published in throw away paper.
This man who composed such profound and perfect lines as “The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried,” stood 6’4″ and weighed about 300 pounds, usually had a cigar in his mouth, and walked around wearing a cape and a crumpled hat, tiny glasses pinched to the end of his nose, swordstick in hand, laughter blowing through his moustache. And usually had no idea where or when his next appointment was. He did much of his writing in train stations, since he usually missed the train he was supposed to catch. In one famous anecdote, he wired his wife, saying, “Am at Market Harborough. Where ought I to be?” His faithful wife, Frances, attended to all the details of his life, since he continually proved he had no way of doing it himself. She was later assisted by a secretary, Dorothy Collins, who became the couple’s surrogate daughter, and went on to become the writer’s literary executrix, continuing to make his work available after his death.
This absent-minded, overgrown elf of a man, who laughed at his own jokes and amused children at birthday parties by catching buns in his mouth, this was the man who wrote a book called The Everlasting Man, which led a young atheist named C.S. Lewis to become a Christian. This was the man who wrote a novel called The Napoleon of Notting Hill, which inspired Michael Collins to lead a movement for Irish Independence. This was the man who wrote an essay in the Illustrated London News that inspired Mohandas Gandhi to lead a movement to end British colonial rule in India. This was a man who, when commissioned to write a book on St. Thomas Aquinas (aptly titled Saint Thomas Aquinas), had his secretary check out a stack of books on St. Thomas from the library, opened the top book on the stack, thumbed through it, closed it, and proceeded to dictate a book on St. Thomas. Not just any book. The renowned Thomistic scholar, Etienne Gilson, had this to say about it:
“I consider it as being without possible comparison the best book ever written on St. Thomas. Nothing short of genius can account for such an achievement. Everybody will no doubt admit that it is a ‘clever’ book, but the few readers who have spent twenty or thirty years in studying St. Thomas. . . cannot fail to perceive that the so-called ‘wit’ of Chesterton has put their scholarship to shame. He has guessed all that which we had tried to demonstrate, and he has said all that which they were more or less clumsily attempting to express in academic formulas. Chesterton was one of the deepest thinkers who ever existed; he was deep because he was right; and he could not help being right; but he could not either help being modest and charitable, so he left it to those who could understand him to know that he was right, and deep; to the others, he apologized for being right, and he made up for being deep by being witty. That is all they can see of him.”Chesterton debated many of the celebrated intellectuals of his time: George Bernard Shaw, H.G. Wells, Bertrand Russell, Clarence Darrow. According to contemporary accounts, Chesterton usually emerged as the winner of these contests, however, the world has immortalized his opponents and forgotten Chesterton, and now we hear only one side of the argument, and we are enduring the legacies of socialism, relativism, materialism, and skepticism. Ironically, all of his opponents regarded Chesterton with the greatest affection. And George Bernard Shaw said: “The world is not thankful enough for Chesterton.His writing has been praised by Ernest Hemingway, Graham Greene, Evelyn Waugh, Jorge Luis Borges, Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Karel Capek, Marshall McLuhan, Paul Claudel, Dorothy L. Sayers, Agatha Christie, Sigrid Undset, Ronald Knox, Kingsley Amis, W.H. Auden, Anthony Burgess, E.F. Schumacher, Neil Gaiman, and Orson Welles. To name a few.
T.S. Eliot said that Chesterton “deserves a permanent claim on our loyalty.”
“. . . and why haven’t I heard of him?
There are three answers to this question:
    1. I don’t know.
    2. You’ve been cheated.
Chesterton is the most unjustly neglected writer of our time. Perhaps it is proof that education is too important to be left to educators and that publishing is too important to be left to publishers, but there is no excuse why Chesterton is no longer taught in our schools and why his writing is not more widely reprinted and especially included in college anthologies. Well, there is an excuse. It seems that Chesterton is tough to pigeonhole, and if a writer cannot be quickly consigned to a category, or to one-word description, he risks falling through the cracks. Even if he weighs three hundred pounds.
But there is another problem. Modern thinkers and commentators and critics have found it much more convenient to ignore Chesterton rather than to engage him in an argument, because to argue with Chesterton is to lose.
Chesterton argued eloquently against all the trends that eventually took over the twentieth century: materialism, scientific determinism, moral relativism, and spineless agnosticism. He also argued against both socialism and capitalism and showed why they have both been the enemies of freedom and justice in modern society.
And what did he argue for? What was it he defended? He defended “the common man” and common sense. He defended the poor. He defended the family. He defended beauty. And he defended Christianity and the Catholic Faith. These don’t play well in the classroom, in the media, or in the public arena. And that is probably why he is neglected. The modern world prefers writers who are snobs, who have exotic and bizarre ideas, who glorify decadence, who scoff at Christianity, who deny the dignity of the poor, and who think freedom means no responsibility.
But even though Chesterton is no longer taught in schools, you cannot consider yourself educated until you have thoroughly read Chesterton. And furthermore, thoroughly reading Chesterton is almost a complete education in itself. Chesterton is indeed a teacher, and the best kind. He doesn’t merely astonish you. He doesn’t just perform the wonder of making you think. He goes beyond that. He makes you laugh.

(Reprinted by kind permission of Dale Ahlquist and the American Chesterton Society.)

Dale Ahlquist is the president and co-founder of the American Chesterton Society.
He is the creator and host of the television series, “G.K. Chesterton: The Apostle of Common Sense,” on EWTN. Dale is the publisher of Gilbert Magazine, author of The Chesterton University Student Handbook, editor of The Gift of Wonder: The Many Sides of G.K. Chesterton, associate editor of the Collected Works of G.K. Chesterton (Ignatius). He has been called “one of the most respected Chesterton scholars in the world” and has delighted audiences around the country with his variety of talks on the great English writer. He is a graduate of Carleton College (B.A.) in Northfield, Minnesota, and Hamline University (M.A.) in St. Paul, Minnesota. He lives near Minneapolis with his wife and five children. Like Chesterton, Dale is a Catholic convert and a joyful defender of the Catholic Faith. He can be contacted at info@chesterton.org.


Related IgnatiusInsight.com Excerpts and Articles

How the Great Wind Came to Beacon House | G. K. Chesterton | Chapter One of Manalive
G.K. Chesterton, the Poet | Denis J. Conlon
St. Thomas More | G. K. Chesterton
A Simple Thought | G. K. Chesterton
The Problem of the Plantagenets | G. K. Chesterton
Chesterton and Orthodoxy | Carl E. Olson and Dale Ahlquist
Seeing With the Eyes of G.K. Chesterton | Dale Ahlquist
Recovering The Lost Art of Common Sense | Dale Ahlquist
Common Sense Apostle & Cigar Smoking Mystic | Dale Ahlquist
Chesterton and the “Paradoxy” of Orthodoxy | Carl E. Olson
The Attraction of Orthodoxy | Joseph Pearce
The Emancipation of Domesticity | G.K. Chesterton
The God in the Cave | G.K. Chesterton
What Is America? | G.K. Chesterton
Mary and the Convert | G.K. Chesterton
Chesterton and Saint Francis | Joseph Pearce
Chesterton and the Delight of Truth | James V. Schall, S.J.
The Life and Theme of G.K. Chesterton | Randall Paine | An Introduction to The Autobiography of G.K. Chesterton
Hot Water and Fresh Air: On Chesterton and His Foes | Janet E. Smith
ChesterBelloc | Ralph McInerny



Ignatius Press Books About Chesterton’s Life and Work



Classic Works by G.K. Chesterton




The Collected Works of G.K. Chesterton
Volume 1: Heretics, Orthodoxy, Blatchford Controversies (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 2: St. Francis, Everlasting Man, St. Thomas (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 3: The Catholic Church and Conversion; Where All Roads Lead; The Well and the Shallows; and others. (Softcover)
• Volume 4: What’s Wrong with the World, Superstition of Divorce, Eugenics and Other Evils (Softcover)
• Volume 5: The Outline of Sanity, The End of The Armistice, The Appetite of Tyranny, Utopia of Usurers, and more (Softcover)
• Volume 6: To be published
• Volume 7: The Ball and the Cross, Manalive, The Flying Inn (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 8: The Man Who Knew Too Much, Tales of the Long Bow, The Return of Don Quixote (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 9: To be published
• Volume 10: Collected Poetry, Part 1 (Softcover)
• Volume 10: Collected Poetry, Part 2 (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 10: Collected Poetry, Part 3 (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 11: Collected Plays and Chesterton on Shaw (Softcover)
• Volume 12: Father Brown Stories, Part 1 (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 13: Father Brown Stories, Part 2 (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 14: Short Stories, Fairy Tales, Mystery Stories (Softcover)
• Volume 15: Chesterton on Dickens (Softcover)
• Volume 16: The Autobiography (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 17: To be published
• Volume 18: Robert Louis Stevenson, Chaucer, Leo Tolstoy, Thomas Carlyle (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 19: To be published
• Volume 20: Christendom in Dublin, Irish Impressions, The New Jerusalem, A Short History of England (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 21: What I Saw in America, The Resurrection of Rome, Sidelights (Softcover)
• Volume 22: To be published
• Volume 23: To be published
• Volume 24: To be published
• Volume 25: To be published
• Volume 26: To be published
• Volume 27: Illustrated London News, 1905-1907 (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 28: Illustrated London News, 1908-1910 (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 29: Illustrated London News, 1911-1913 (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 30: Illustrated London News, 1914-1916 (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 31: Illustrated London News, 1917-1919 (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 32: Illustrated London News, 1920-1922 (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 33: Illustrated London News, 1923-1925 (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 34: Illustrated London News, 1926-1928 (Softcover | Hardcover)
• Volume 35: Illustrated London News, 1929-1931
• Volume 36: Illustrated London News, 1932-1934 (Softcover | Hardcover)


….


Taken from: http://www.ignatiusinsight.com/authors/gkchesterton.asp

Monday, July 27, 2015

Pope Francis' exhortation to walk on the margins makes us squirm


  • Pope Francis arrives to meet people gathered at a house as he visits Banado Norte, a poor neighborhood in Asuncion, Paraguay, on July 12. (CNS/Paul Haring)
 | 
Editorial
In the growing corpus of Pope Francis pronouncements -- in homilies and speeches and encyclicals -- an eloquence adheres that might safely be characterized as singular in quality in the long history of papal literature. It is an eloquence eminently accessible, born of personal experience and shaped primarily by his love of the poor.
It is not a distant love or a romanticized notion out of which he speaks. He doesn't make heroes of poor people or conjure some noble purpose out of poverty that will somehow be fully realized in the next life.
Quite the opposite. Transcendence is not reserved for some other reality. For Francis, the Christ we worship in the quiet of the sanctuary is the Christ of the streets. Francis is about real here-and-now situations in very plain language, and that language at times is disarmingly undiplomatic.
Indeed, in the United States, the eloquence is difficult to discern. The words make us squirm.
During his speech in Bolivia to members of popular movements, he said: "When we look into the eyes of the suffering, when we see the faces of the endangered campesino, the poor laborer, the downtrodden native, the homeless family, the persecuted migrant, the unemployed young person, the exploited child, the mother who lost her child in a shootout because the barrio was occupied by drug dealers, the father who lost his daughter to enslavement ... when we think of all those names and faces, our hearts break because of so much sorrow and pain. And we are deeply moved."
It was a telling moment. No one smirked or thought it an exaggeration that he places himself fully within those circles. He's been there. It is part of the authenticity that makes his words not only bearable when they might understandably repel, but actually inviting and enticing.
His exhortation to walk to the margins is not a rhetorical flourish; his now-familiar reference to the "art of encounter" is not metaphor. The images he supplies repeatedly in real time and circumstances demonstrate precisely what he means -- move into the margins of society among the broken, the disfigured, the financially destitute, those behind bars. They are the first preference for his attention and energy, the starting point from which flows his understanding of the heart of the Gospel and the Christian life.
How many of us have heard during a retreat or day of recollection some version of the "inverted triangle," a simple image to explain how the Christian understanding of what is important in life might be different from what is preached by Wall Street or the daily bombardment of ads encountered in every corner of life.
Francis goes deeper than explanation, well beyond mere tolerance. And this, perhaps, is what makes us nervous here in the First World, the developed world, the rich North. This pope is not ideological or partisan. He is radical in the most essential sense -- going to the root of things. It can't be overstated that an indispensable part of his formation occurred steeped in the "storms of people's lives" in the slums around Buenos Aires, Argentina. These are not places where one meets perfect nuclear Catholic families. These are not places of investment portfolios, career ladders, elegant dinners and heady intellectual conversation. These are not places that influence a country's economic or military policies. But they are his starting point, the first lens through which he views the rest of the world.
Those who wish to define Catholic orthodoxy by a narrow list of sexual sins are inclined to describe themselves as countercultural, fighting the mighty forces of secularism. Come September and Francis' visit, we all are likely to be shaken to our roots by a much-expanded definition of Catholic orthodoxy and a far more demanding idea of what it means to be countercultural in the United States.
"You, dear brothers and sisters, often work on little things, in local situations, amid forms of injustice which you do not simply accept but actively resist," he told the community activists in Bolivia. He was applauding them and their heroic work for "standing up to an idolatrous system which excludes, debases and kills."
Those in the room needed no further explanation of what he meant by "an idolatrous system." It is, in his words, "a globalization that excludes." He is about to arrive in globalization central.


....


Taken from: http://ncronline.org/news/faith-parish/editorial-pope-francis-exhortation-walk-margins-makes-us-squirm


Tuesday, July 14, 2015

Pope says his economic message isn't class warfare, it's church doctrine



Updated 1544 GMT (2244 HKT) July 14, 2015


(CNN)Pope Francis defended himself against critics who accuse him of preaching class warfare, saying that he's just applying Catholic teachings to an economic system that is highly polarized between the rich and poor.
"It is I who follow the church!" the Pope said. "It's not a fight against an enemy, it's catechism." The catechism is the Catholic Church's summary of doctrine and social teachings.


The Pope was speaking at a press conference on the flight back to Rome from South America, where he had railed against the relentless pursuit of profit and said human lives are being sacrificed on the "altar of money."


Francis also said that he has heard criticism of his economic messages, particularly the lengthy environmental manifesto released last month, and will respond when he has had time to study the critiques. He plans to visit Washington, New York and Philadelphia this September.
    Here are other highlights from the Pope's press conference on Sunday evening, with questions from various reporters on the plane.
    Q: Your Holiness, one of the strongest messages of this trip was that the global economic system imposes a profit mentality at any cost, to the detriment of the poor. This is perceived by Americans as a direct criticism of their system and their way of life. How do you respond to this perception, and what is your evaluation of the impact of the United States in the world?
    A: What I said, that phrase, it's not new. I said in (the apostolic letter) "Evangelii Gaudium": This economy kills. ... And I said it in (the encyclical) "Laudato Si."
    It's not a new thing, this is known. ... I heard that there were some criticisms from the United States. I heard about it but I haven't read about it, I haven't had the time to study this well, because every criticism must be received, studied and then dialogue must ensue.
    Q: Now you will go the United States. ... You must have some thoughts about the nation.
    A: No, I have to begin to study now.
    Q: I have a father who is younger than you and has half your energy. ... What is your secret?
    A: What is your drug is what he means, that's the question! (Laughter.) ... Mate helps me but I have never tasted coca.
    Q: Holy Father, on this trip, we've heard so many strong messages for the poor, also many strong, at times severe messages for the rich and powerful. But something we've heard very little was a message for the middle class, that is, people who work, people who pay their taxes, so "normal people." My question is why ... are there so few messages of the middle class? If there were such a message, what would it be?
    A: Thank you so much. It's a good correction, thanks. You are right. It's an error of mine not to think about this. I will make a comment but not to justify myself. You're right. I have to think a bit.
    The world is polarized. The middle class becomes smaller. The polarization makes the (difference between) rich and the poor big. This is true. And perhaps this has brought me not to take account of this, no?
    Some nations are doing very well, but in the world in general the polarization is seen. And the number of poor is large. And why do I speak of the poor? Because they're at the heart of the Gospel. I always speak from the Gospel on poverty, no? It's not that it's sociological.
    Then, on the middle class, there are some words that I've said, but a little in passing. But the common people, the simple people, the worker, that is a great value, no? But, I think you're telling me about something I need to do. I need to delve further into this.
    Q: Your Holiness, you present yourself as the new world leader of alternative politics. I would like to know: Why do you support so strongly popular movements and not so much the business world?
    A: The popular movements are a big reality, all over the world. What I gave them is the social doctrine of the church, just as I do with the business world. If you look back at what I told the popular movements, it comes from the church's social doctrine.
    Q: What do you think of people taking selfies at Mass and that young people want to take with you?
    A: What do I think of it? I feel like a great-grandfather! It's another culture. Today as I was taking leave (from Asuncion, Paraguay) a policeman in his 40s asked me for a selfie! I told him you're a teenager! It's another culture -- I respect it.

    ....