Friday, August 28, 2026

Zebedee inscription in Capernaum

 


 

“Numerous stone artifacts found at the site include olive presses and millstones, dishes and craters (large bowls for mixing wine), and the earliest known

pictorial representation of the Ark of the Covenant”.

Mike Mason

 

In my recent article:

 

Whence that name, Capernaum?

 (2) Whence that name, Capernaum?

 

I suggested, following Charles Boutflower, that the prophet Isaiah (who is my Nahum), he and his family – a type of the Holy Family – had fled to Galilee to escape the wrath of king Ahaz of Judah. Instead of Boutflower’s Nazareth in Galilee, though, I had opted for Capernaum, allowing for the place to be named after a Nahum, thus Kfar Naum (כְּפַר נַחוּם), literally, ‘Nahum’s village’.

 

And further, since (Isaiah) Nahum was also Jonah (cf. Tobit 14:4), I had proceeded to suggest, in my follow-up article:

 

Were any Old Testament prophets from Galilee?

 

(2) Were any Old Testament prophets from Galilee?

 

that Jonah’s Gath-hepher (2 Kings 14:25) must have been the original name of the place, before it was re-named after the prophet Nahum (Jonah).

 

The Hebrew name, Gath-hepher (גַּת הַחֵפֶר), is apparently associated with “winepress”, “winepress of the well”, or “winepress of the digging”: 

Topical Bible: Gath-Hepher

 

As we read above: “Numerous stone artifacts found at the site include olive presses and millstones, dishes and craters (large bowls for mixing wine) …”.

It would be an appropriate site to have prompted Jesus to utter (Luke 17:2): ‘It would be better to be thrown into the sea with a millstone hung around your neck than to cause one of these little ones to fall into sin’.

 

And that leads us seamlessly into this insightful article by Dr. Noel Rabinowitz:

Millstones Made in Capernaum – Dr. Noel Rabinowitz

 

 

Millstones Made in Capernaum

 

Bible interpreters have much to say concerning Yeshua’s [Jesus’s] teaching about the humble status of children in Matthew 18:1-6 but they usually overlook where that event takes place – a detail that is actually quite important to the story. After deflating the disciples’ ambitions for power and prestige in the Kingdom, Yeshua follows up with a stern warning: “But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea” (v.6).

 

We know from Matthew 17:24 that Yeshua and his disciples had returned to Capernaum and this detail enables us to interpret Yeshua’s words here with even greater clarity. Capernaum is located on the northern shoreline of the Sea of Galilee and sits on a bed of basalt rock, the remains of a long extinct volcano. Fishing was obviously the major industry at Capernaum but it wasn’t the only industry – the basalt provided Capernaum with nutrient-rich farming soil in which to grow high quality grains. The abundance of basalt, however, made Capernaum home to a third industry, namely the manufacture of heavy-duty agricultural tools such as olive presses, household griding tools and industrial millstones.

 

Excavators found a large quantity of unfinished tools at Capernaum – many more than the residents of the village could have possibly needed, indicating that these tools were manufactured for sale.

 

Workman made small household grinding stones as well as industrial millstones which were much larger and much heavier than the household version.

 

The bottom part of the industrial millstone was cone-shaped and sat on the ground, pointy-end up. The top part, which rested on top of the cone, was shaped like an hourglass with what looked like a stone belt at the waste of the hourglass. A wooden log was inserted into the “belt” and turned by a donkey. Grain was poured into the top and ground as the donkey turned the stone.

 

English Bibles typically translate the Greek phrase μύλος νικς (mulos onikos) something along the lines of ‘great millstone” (ESV), “large millstone” (NIV), “heavy millstone” (NASB); “huge milestone” (NET) or simply “millstone” (KJV). The Greek phrase, however, literally means “millstone of a donkey.” Yeshua was clearly referring to the hourglass-shaped – and extremely heavy – upper section of an industrial millstone.

 

Now, Yeshua’s warning becomes extraordinarily vivid! He and his disciples were in Capernaum with the Sea of Galilee in plain view. Perhaps they were even standing along the lake’s shoreline when Yeshua made this statement. And they had no doubt walked past the millstone factory many times. It wasn’t hard for them to visualize the horrific death of someone with an industrial-grade basalt grinder tied around his neck sinking to the bottom of the lake. The fate of those who cause one of Yeshua’s disciples to sin is intended as a warning for us all.


Capernaum (Chapter 18 of Jesus: His Story In Stone)

Capernaum (Chapter 18 of Jesus: His Story In Stone)

 

Posted on August 31, 2015 by Mike Mason

 

Leaving Nazareth, He went to live in Capernaum. –Mt 4:13

 

The ancient village of Capernaum (which means town of Nahum) was located on the north shore of the Sea of Galilee, some three miles west of where the upper Jordan River flows into the lake from the northern mountains.

 

In Jesus’ day its population was about 1500, small compared to several much larger cities on the lake. But Capernaum was strategically important for being on a primary trade route known as the Via Maris (Way of the Sea) that carried traffic from the interior along the top of the lake toward the Mediterranean coast. In Capernaum Jesus called five of His disciples: the four fishermen Peter, Andrew, James and John, and the tax collector Matthew. In fact there were “many tax collectors” stationed here, showing that this was a significant financial center, as well as hosting a detachment of Roman soldiers (Mt 8:5-13).

 

Ruins of Capernaum

 

Discovered by the explorer Edward Robinson in 1838, the ruins of this village reveal a network of adjoining houses built of undressed and unmortared basalt blocks, reinforced with stones and mud. A typical single-story house, accomodating two or more kindred families, consisted of small rooms with cobbled floors arranged around an open courtyard, with stone steps leading up to a roof made of light wooden beams, thatch, and packed dirt.

 

Numerous stone artifacts found at the site include olive presses and millstones, dishes and craters (large bowls for mixing wine), and the earliest known pictorial representation of the Ark of the Covenant. The second photograph shows another interesting discovery, the so-called Zebedee inscription which, though it dates from the fourth century, mentions the family name of the father of James and John, “the sons of Zebedee” (Mk 10:35). 

 

The full inscription reads: “Alphaeus the son of Zebedee the son of John made this column. May it be for him a blessing ...”.

 

The Zebedee Pillar

 

It was here in Capernaum that Jesus chose to establish headquarters for the early part of His ministry. Matthew refers to it as Jesus’ “own town” (9:1) and many chapters of the gospels are set here. Outstanding miracles of healing were performed in Capernaum, including that of the man with a shriveled hand (Mk 3:1-6), the centurion’s servant (Mt 8:5-13), a demonized man (Mk 1:21-89), and a paralytic (Mk 2:1-12). Regarding the latter story, the photograph shows how easy it would have been for the paralytic’s four friends to escape the crowds by climbing over the rooftops of the abutting houses, digging through the light thatch, and lowering their friend directly into the courtyard of the house where Jesus was teaching.

 

Note that all these miracles contain important elements beyond the miracle itself. In the case of the paralytic, Jesus made a public demonstration of forgiving his sins, thus drawing the accusation of blasphemy from the teachers of the law. Similarly, the man with a shriveled hand was healed on the sabbath, again rousing his opponents’ ire. As for the demonized man, when the demon testified loudly to knowing who Jesus was —“the Holy One of God!”— Jesus told him sternly to be quiet. In each case, it seems, the real point was not the miracle, amazing though it was, but the explosive secret of Jesus’ true identity. As the Pharisees complained, “Who can forgive sins but God alone?” (Mk 2:7)

 

In the end, despite such tremendous works of power, and despite the amazing blessing of having the Son of God living in their midst, Capernaum rejected its famous rabbi, compelling Jesus in turn to reject the town: “And you, Capernaum, will you be lifted up to the skies? No, you will go down to the depths…. It will be more bearable for Sodom on the day of judgment than for you” (Mt 11:23-4).

 

(Photos by Karen Mason)

 

Sunday, August 23, 2026

Christological significance of Nahum



 

“The “good tidings” of Nahum 1:15 anticipate the gospel itself:

the announcement of peace through the victory of God over evil.

Christ, the ultimate conqueror, defeats not earthly empires

but the greater tyranny of sin and death”.

  

We read at:

Exploring Nahum: Justice and Hope in the Fall of Nineveh

 

The Book of Nahum

 

The book of Nahum is a vivid, poetic, and uncompromising proclamation of divine justice. It announces the fall of Nineveh—the proud capital of the Assyrian Empire—and in doing so, reveals the holiness, sovereignty, and vengeance of God against evil.

 

Often called the “Book of the Burden of Nineveh,” Nahum stands as a sequel to Jonah. Where Jonah reveals God’s mercy toward a repentant city, Nahum reveals His justice toward a city that has returned to violence and arrogance. It is a book that exalts the moral order of the universe, assuring believers that though wickedness may prosper for a time, the Lord will not allow it to endure forever.

 

I. Authorship and Historical Setting

 

Nahum (“Comfort” or “Consolation”) was a prophet from Elkosh, perhaps a small village in Judah.  [Mackey’s comment: Actually, it was Ali Qosh near Nineveh. Nahum, who was Jonah (cf. Tobit 14:4), a prophet from the tribe of Simeon, tarried for a time in Nineveh]. His name fittingly reflects the nature of his message: a comfort to God’s oppressed people and a warning to their cruel oppressors. Beyond this, little is known of his life,

 

[Mackey’s comment: But see my articles, e.g.:

 

De-coding Jonah

 

(8) De-coding Jonah

 

God can raise up prophets at will - even from a shepherd of Simeon

 

(8) God can raise up prophets at will - even from a shepherd of Simeon

 

but his words reveal a man of deep theological conviction and poetic skill.

The prophecy likely dates between 663 and 612 B.C.

 

[Mackey’s comment: See my articles. Nahum-Jonah died well before these dates. Nahum’s No-Amon does not refer too Thebes, as is commonly thought].

 

The earlier date is set by Nahum’s reference to the fall of No-Amon (Thebes) in Egypt (3:8–10), which occurred in 663 B.C., and the later by the destruction of Nineveh itself in 612 B.C. Thus, Nahum wrote sometime in the middle of the seventh century B.C., during the reign of Manasseh or Josiah.

 

This was a period of great distress for Judah. The Assyrian Empire, having dominated the Near East for over a century, had conquered Israel (the northern kingdom) in 722 B.C. and subjected Judah to vassalage and humiliation. Assyria’s cruelty was infamous: its kings boasted of massacres, enslavement, and terror as instruments of control.

 

Nineveh, the empire’s glittering capital, represented the height of human pride and violence. Yet, amid this darkness, Nahum’s message shines as a declaration that God’s justice would prevail: the oppressor would be destroyed and the faithful would find comfort in the Lord’s righteous reign.

 

II. Structure and Literary Design

 

Nahum is one of the most beautifully structured prophetic books, combining artistry with theological force. Its three chapters form a tightly woven prophetic poem that moves from the declaration of divine character to the vivid depiction of Nineveh’s downfall:

 

 

  1. The Majesty and Justice of God (Chapter 1)

 

    • The book opens with a majestic theophany: a vision of God as a jealous, avenging, and sovereign Lord.
    • He is slow to anger yet great in power, and He will not acquit the wicked (1:3).
    • The chapter serves as both a psalm of praise and a prelude to judgment, contrasting the destruction of God’s enemies with the peace promised to His people: “The LORD is good, a strong hold in the day of trouble; and he knoweth them that trust in him” (1:7).

 

  1. The Siege and Destruction of Nineveh (Chapter 2)

 

    • The prophet describes Nineveh’s impending fall in striking military imagery: chariots racing, shields gleaming red, walls breached, and the city plundered.
    • The once-mighty empire is reduced to chaos, its wealth carried away, its people fleeing in terror.
    • The language is both poetic and prophetic, emphasizing that the devastation is not merely the result of human warfare but of divine retribution: “Behold, I am against thee, saith the LORD of hosts” (2:13).

 

  1. The Reasons for Judgment and Its Finality (Chapter 3)

 

    • Nahum details Nineveh’s sins: bloodshed, lies, sorcery, arrogance, and idolatry.
    • The “bloody city” (3:1) that had enslaved nations will itself be shamed, stripped, and left desolate.
    • The prophecy concludes with a note of finality: “There is no healing of thy bruise; thy wound is grievous” (3:19).
    • The nations, once terrified by Assyria’s power, will rejoice at her fall: “All that hear the bruit of thee shall clap the hands over thee.”

 

III. Themes and Theology

 

Nahum is a study in the attributes of God revealed through judgment. Its themes are both sobering and strengthening, calling readers to reverence before the justice and sovereignty of the Lord.

 

  • The Justice and Holiness of God:
    Nahum affirms that God’s justice is neither arbitrary nor cruel. His wrath is the necessary response of holiness to sin. “The LORD is slow to anger” (1:3), yet when patience ends, His judgment is absolute and righteous.
  • The Sovereignty of God Over Nations:
    The downfall of Nineveh demonstrates that no empire—no matter how powerful—can stand against the purposes of God. Nations rise and fall under His decree (cf. Daniel 2:21).
  • The Certainty of Judgment:
    Assyria’s destruction was not theoretical but historical. The prophecy’s accuracy underscores that divine warnings are not empty threats. The moral order of the world is upheld by a God who acts.
  • The Comfort of the Righteous:
    For Judah, Nahum’s message was not merely about vengeance but about deliverance. “Behold upon the mountains the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that publisheth peace!” (1:15). God’s justice against evil is the foundation of His people’s hope.
  • The Danger of Pride and Cruelty:
    Nineveh’s arrogance, cruelty, and self-deification stand as warnings to every generation. The same sins that destroyed Assyria—pride, violence, deceit—remain the downfall of nations and individuals who defy God’s authority.

 

IV. Historical and Apologetic Considerations

 

Archaeological discoveries have confirmed Nahum’s prophecy with striking accuracy. Excavations at Nineveh reveal evidence of a violent destruction consistent with the Babylonian-[sic] Median conquest of 612 B.C.: massive fires, toppled walls, and widespread devastation. Once considered impregnable, Nineveh vanished beneath the sands of history, just as Nahum foretold: “Nineveh is laid waste: who will bemoan her?” (3:7).

 

Nahum’s oracles also correct any misconception that God is indifferent to evil. His destruction of Nineveh, long delayed since Jonah’s time, shows that divine patience is not permissiveness. God’s mercy and justice are not contradictory but complementary. He is merciful in warning and just in fulfilling His word.

 

V. Christological Significance

 

While Nahum does not mention the Messiah directly, it contributes profoundly to the biblical revelation of God’s character, a revelation ultimately fulfilled in Christ. The divine attributes displayed in Nahum—justice, wrath, and steadfast love—find perfect harmony in the person of Jesus.

 

At the cross, God’s wrath against sin and His mercy toward sinners meet in perfect balance. The same Lord who judged Nineveh bore judgment on behalf of His people. The “good tidings” of Nahum 1:15 anticipate the gospel itself: the announcement of peace through the victory of God over evil. Christ, the ultimate conqueror, defeats not earthly empires but the greater tyranny of sin and death.

 

VI. Practical and Devotional Application

 

Nahum calls believers to trust the righteousness of God in times of injustice and oppression.

 

It assures the faithful that evil will not reign forever, and that God’s timing, though mysterious, is always perfect. In an age when moral relativism blurs distinctions between right and wrong, Nahum reminds us that divine justice is absolute and inescapable.

 

The book also warns against pride, self-reliance, and cruelty. Nations and individuals alike are accountable to the Lord of hosts. True security lies not in fortresses or wealth but in humility before God and faith in His Word. For those who trust Him, Nahum’s stern message becomes a source of deep comfort: “The LORD is good, a strong hold in the day of trouble; and he knoweth them that trust in him” (1:7).

 

VII. Conclusion

 

The prophecy of Nahum is both terrifying and consoling: a thunderclap of judgment and a whisper of hope. It declares that the moral universe is not chaotic: God reigns, and He will vindicate His righteousness. Nineveh’s ruins stand as a monument to the truth that no power can withstand His justice.

 

For the believer, Nahum offers this enduring assurance: the same God who brings down the proud also lifts up the humble. The Lord’s vengeance against evil is the foundation of everlasting peace for His people. The book closes, not in despair, but in triumph: the wicked fall and the righteous rest secure in the justice of their Redeemer.



 

 

 

 

Friday, August 21, 2026

Queenship of Blessed Virgin Mary

 


 

Today is the feast day of the

Queenship of Mary

22nd August, 2026

  

“The Church celebrates the Queenship of the Blessed Virgin Mary each year

on August 22, on the Octave of her Assumption into Heaven”.

 Dr. Marc Tinsley

  

Dr. Marc Tinsley wrote (August 22, 2025):

The Queenship of the Blessed Virgin Mary – Fiercely Catholic

 

The Queenship of the Blessed Virgin Mary

 

Rooted in Sacred Scripture and professed in prayers and hymns, the Catholic Church considers the Blessed Virgin Mary to be the Queen of Heaven and Earth.

 

The mother of God should be honored at least as much as the Old Testament kings honored their mothers by making them queens instead of their wives. King Solomon’s mother even wore a crown and sat on a throne at his right hand.

 

The angel Gabriel announced to Mary that Jesus would reign on the throne of David forever, and Elizabeth addressed Mary as the mother of the Lord.

 

Mary is highly honored in a special way, more than any other saint, but although she is the queen of Heaven and Earth, she is never the subject of worship or adoration. The humble Virgin is venerated as a queen only because of her Son’s kingship.

 

Mary’s coronation as Queen of Heaven and Earth is meditated on as the Fifth Glorious Mystery of the Rosary.

 

Pope Pius XII proclaimed the Queenship of Mary and established a feast in 1954, although the Catholic Church has acknowledged Mary’s queenship as a share of her Son’s kingship since its earliest days.

 

The Church celebrates the Queenship of the Blessed Virgin Mary each year on August 22, on the Octave of her Assumption into Heaven.

 

Mary is Queen of Heaven and Earth:

 

Pope’s Worldwide Prayer Network – USA

 

A unique role in salvation history:

 

Videos of The Fifth Glorious Mystery The Coronation of Mary Fr Daniel …

https://youtu.be/OeS6yaG8uOw

Fr. Daniel O’Reilly

 

A great sign appeared in the sky, a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars.

 

Revelation 12: 1

 

A woman in Heaven wearing a crown of twelve stars:

 

Catholic Productions

 

“Finally the Immaculate Virgin, preserved free from all stain of original sin, when the course of her earthly life was finished, was taken up body and soul into heavenly glory, and exalted by the Lord as Queen over all things, so that she might be the more fully conformed to her Son, the Lord of lords and conqueror of sin and death.” The Assumption of the Blessed Virgin is a singular participation in her Son’s Resurrection and an anticipation of the resurrection of other Christians.

 

Catechism of the Catholic Church 966

 

Scripture mentions the queen mother along with the king:

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juRNmw1ZtsM

 

In particular, the image of the Virgin Mary as Queen finds important confirmation in today’s Gospel, where Jesus declares: “Behold, some are last who will be first, and some are first who will be last”. This expression is typical of Christ as it clearly reflects a theme dear to his prophetic teaching, because the Evangelists recorded it several times although differently formulated. Our Lady is the perfect example of this Gospel truth, namely that God brings down the proud of this world and raises the humble. The small and simple young girl of Nazareth became Queen of the world! This is one of the marvels that reveal God’s Heart. Of course, Mary’s queenship is totally relative to Christ’s kingship.

 

Pope Benedict XVI, Angelus Address, 22 August 2010

 

Monday, August 3, 2026

Elihu prophesying on God’s behalf

 

 


by

 Damien F. Mackey

 

 

“Because Elihu really is providing us with truth and revelation. ….

Elihu is on the scene to resolve the dispute, chastising both prior groups

and offering the correct theological perspective”.

 

Stan Rock

  

Previously I have proposed – following others – that young Elihu of the Book of Job was both wise and prophetically inclined:

 

Young Elihu in the Book of Job corrects the ‘wisdom’ of the aged

 

(5) Young Elihu in the Book of Job corrects the ‘wisdom’ of the aged

 

and that:

 

Elihu a contemporary of the prophet Ezekiel

 

(5) Elihu a contemporary of the prophet Ezekiel

 

May even, potentially, have been Ezekiel.

 

Here I take up what Stan Rock has to say about young Elihu (2014)

Christus Victor: Existentialism Faces Eternity

 

Elihu, the Forgotten Prophet of Job

 

The Book of Job is one of the most important of the entire Bible, and is a prerequisite to all discussions of Christian theology, particularly theodicy.

 

Unfortunately, two erroneous interpretations of Job’s theses are by far the most popular.

 

Job the Hero: The Sunday School Interpretation

 

In Sunday School as a child, the Book of Job was presented to me as the story of:

 

  • Satan’s challenge to God,
  • Job’s suffering as a result,
  • Job courageously refusing to curse God through the suffering,
  • and God rewarding that fortitude with recompense and a happy ending.

 

This is the story of Job in the shallow end of the Christian pool. ….

 

Bad Friends: The “No Heroes” Interpretation

The other popular “take-away” from Job is that when someone is suffering, words only make things worse, and each person who talked to Job was wrong.

 

Job’s friends Eliphaz, Zophar, and Bildad are indeed rebuked, in the end, by God himself. And Job’s complaints against his friends would seem to serve such a thesis.

 

Ravi Zacharias wrote in his recent book, “Why Suffering? Finding Meaning and Comfort When Life Doesn’t Make Sense”:

“[A ‘negative reality’ emerged in] the colossal failure of [Job’s] friends. They were at their best when they took time out of their own lives just to be with him, saying nothing. The moment they began to give their own observations for why Job was suffering and offer their suggestions for remedying his situation, Job’s pain intensified. To be loved and feel cared about is what someone who is hurting needs from friends.”

 

Zacharias sees the problem of Job’s friends remedied only by God’s ultimate arrival:

“So the failure we see in the story of Job is the failure of friendship. Then comes the answer of God. God’s answer was not propositional, but relational. And that is what Job most needed. He simply needed to know that God was with him through his ordeal … that God had not abandoned him.”

 

The Problems With These Interpretations

 

The former interpretation accounts for Job chapters 1, chapter 2 verses 1 through 10, and chapter 42 verses 10 through 16. As such, it is missing about 40 chapters of content.

 

The latter interpretation has completely jettisoned the most overlooked prophet in the Old Testament: Elihu.

 

An Overview of Job

 

Job’s 42 chapters contain the following:

 

  • An introduction to Job’s predicament.
  • Job arguing with friends Eliphaz, Zophar, and Bildad about whether Job is righteous vs. whether God is just.
  • Elihu arguing against both Job and Job’s 3 friends.
  • The Storm of God arriving and boasting of His transcendent power, wisdom, and justice.
  • The conclusion: Job repents, God rebukes Job’s 3 friends (not Elihu), and Job is given recompense (as far as it can be called that).

 

Notice how much material Elihu provides, material never thereafter rebutted, left to be punctuated by God himself. Isn’t it odd that he is so often forgotten, bundled as “just another friend” alongside Eliphaz, Zophar, and Bildad?

 

Elihu as Prophet

 

Elihu is not a shy character. He’s a young upstart, and makes no apologies about the wisdom he brings to the table:

“I thought, ‘Age should speak; advanced years should teach wisdom.’ But it is the spirit in a person, the breath of the Almighty, that gives them understanding. It is not only the old who are wise, not only the aged who understand what is right. … My words come from an upright heart; my lips sincerely speak what I know. The Spirit of God has made me; the breath of the Almighty gives me life. … Be silent, [Job,] and I will teach you wisdom. … Hear my words, you wise men [Eliphaz, Zophar, Bildad]; listen to me, you men of learning. … So listen to me, you men of understanding. … If you have understanding, hear this; listen to what I say.”

 

All this, and God does not rebuke him like he rebukes everyone else.

 

Why?

 

Because Elihu really is providing us with truth and revelation.

He really is confronting Job, Eliphaz, Zophar, and Bildad and correcting their bad theology.

“Bear with me a little longer and I will show you that there is more to be said on God’s behalf. I get my knowledge from afar; I will ascribe justice to my Maker. Be assured that my words are not false; one who has perfect knowledge is with you.”

 

This isn’t some joke.

 

This is prophecy.

 

Elihu is on the scene to resolve the dispute, chastising both prior groups and offering the correct theological perspective.

 

Job’s Lamentation Theology

 

The calamity that befalls Job — and for which God is superordinately responsible (he deliberately gave permission to Satan here, after all) — prompts Job to regret the day he was born. He claims personal righteousness, and thus his misfortunes must be indicative (given that superordinate responsibility) of injustice in God, given that justice means, “He repays everyone for what they have done; he brings on them what their conduct deserves (Job 34).”

 

Job laments the fact that he cannot approach God personally with the case for his innocence; he yearns to do so! His friends aren’t “buying” that case, but Job surmises that a person lives that could vindicate him.

 

Job doesn’t relax God’s classical attributes. He fully endorses God’s omnipotence and superordinate responsibility (Job 12), as well as his cosmic wisdom (Job 28).

 

As such, Job’s theodicean solution — his “lamentation theology” — is to indict God’s benevolence.

“There is no justice,” Job says.

 

The Karmic Folk Theology of Eliphaz, Zophar, & Bildad

 

Eliphaz, Zophar, and Bildad have different emphases, but repeat some similar themes, and since are all rebuked, can be treated as a group.

 

Their argument is as follows: Since God is just (“He repays everyone for what they have done”) and superordinately responsible for what happens to a person, then if something bad happens to a person, it must be in response to something that person has done. Eliphaz articulates this “common sense” karmic folk theology:

“Who, being innocent, has ever perished? Where were the upright ever destroyed? As I have observed, those who plow evil and those who sow trouble reap it.”

 

Bildad, for example, jumps to the conclusion that Job’s sons must have been sinners, too:

“Does God pervert justice? Does the Almighty pervert what is right? When your children sinned against him, he gave them over to the penalty of their sin.”

 

Every time Job insists that he’s innocent, his friends go the opposite direction: Job must be super wicked, and trying to hide it. Zophar says:

“Though evil is sweet in [a wicked man’s] mouth, and he hides it under his tongue… [it] will turn sour in his stomach [and] become the venom of serpents within him.”

 

As Job proves adamant in his own defense, his friend Bildad retreats to that classic “catch-all” of total depravity: As a human, you are so beneath God that you are a worthless maggot and deserve whatever happens to you.

“How then can a mortal be righteous before God? How can one born of woman be pure? If even the moon is not bright and the stars are not pure in his eyes, how much less a mortal, who is but a maggot; a human being, who is only a worm!”

 

Eliphaz weaves a powerful figure: A wealthy man, portly and happy, brought down to shriveling, sickly misery.

 

Elihu’s Rejection of Job’s Lamentation Theology

 

First, Elihu sees it within human capacity to discern God’s justice in the abstract, even if we don’t know how it plays out day-by-day. He rejects the idea that God’s goodness and justice are completely inscrutable, as if something without human-appreciable meaning.

“For the ear tests words as the tongue tastes food. Let us discern for ourselves what is right; let us learn together what is good.”

 

Elihu further defines justice (“He repays everyone for what they have done”) and rejects the notion that God would pervert justice.

 

So, Elihu joins Eliphaz, Zophar, and Bildad against Job’s claim of innocence.

“His eyes are on the ways of mortals; he sees their every step. … Should God then reward you on your terms, when you refuse to repent? … [We all agree that] Job speaks without knowledge; his words lack insight. Oh, that Job might be tested to the utmost for answering like a wicked man! To his sin he adds rebellion; scornfully he claps his hands among us and multiplies his words against God.”

 

Elihu’s Rejection of Karmic Folk Theology


But here’s where it gets interesting.

 

Elihu agrees, Job has sinned, insofar as Job arrogantly indicted God for injustice, speaking “of things [he] did not understand”; Job’s plea, laden with such “empty talk,” was brazen, reckless, and cheap.

 

But he rejects the notion that man is a “maggot” who deserves whatever befalls him.

 

The transcendence of God to man does not make man despised, but rather, makes man’s wickedness less impactful to God:

“Look up at the heavens and see; gaze at the clouds so high above you. If you sin, how does that affect him? If your sins are many, what does that do to him? … Your wickedness only affects humans like yourself.”

 

Instead of a “despised mankind” narrative, Elihu crafts a narrative in which God has an instrumental purpose for all he does:

“God is mighty, but despises no one; he is mighty, and firm in his purpose.”

 

In this way, God’s justice is comprehensible, but the intricacies of how that justice will be made manifest are mysterious. God is not a flayer; he’s a teacher:

“Who is a teacher like him? Who has prescribed his ways for him, or said to him, ‘You have done wrong’? … How great is God — beyond our understanding!”

 

It’s less about “vengeance,” but instead about correction, forebearing as long as that purpose has hope:

“He tells [the sinner] what they have done — that they have sinned arrogantly. He makes them listen to correction and commands them to repent of their evil.”

 

He recrafts Eliphaz’s tale of the sickened man into a narrative of redemption:

“Someone may be chastened on a bed of pain with constant distress in their bones, so that their body finds food repulsive and their soul loathes the choicest meal. Their flesh wastes away to nothing, and their bones, once hidden, now stick out. They draw near to the pit, and their life to the place of the dead.

 

Yet if there is an angel at their side, a messenger, one out of a thousand, sent to tell them how to be upright, and he is gracious to that person and says to God, ‘Spare them from going down to the pit; I have found a ransom for them — let their flesh be renewed like a child’s; let them be restored as in the days of their youth’  — then that person can pray to God and find favor with him, they will see God’s face and shout for joy; he will restore them to full well-being. … God does all these things to a person — twice, even three times — to turn them back from the pit, that the light of life may shine on them.”

 

Christ as Victor

 

We’ve talked before about how the existential dilemma of Ecclesiastes — ultimate meaninglessness — received a practical solution in Christ as conqueror of death.

 

In Job, we see the dilemma of justice, where the wicked may enjoy the peace of death without their due repayment, and where the playing-out of God’s justice may involve the unrewarded — in life — suffering of the faithful.

 

Christ, as conqueror of death, is also the final judge. The final judgment is not for God’s edification — Elihu correctly explains that God doesn’t need to hold a tribunal — but for ours. And through that process, all “loose ends” can be wrapped-up entirely:

 

“For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each of us may receive what is due us for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad.”

 

Elihu as Bridge


From the Jewish Encyclopedia:

“[Elihu’s] meaning is ‘He is my God’ [in the sense of] ‘He remains my God and does not change.’ … [His] argument is as follows: God is the educator of mankind, who punishes only until the sinner has atoned for his sin and recognizes his wrong-doing. Then God has attained His object, to ‘bring back his soul from the pit, to be enlightened with the light of the living.’

Elihu, therefore, holds a middle ground, maintaining that God neither ‘takes away judgment,’ nor sends suffering merely as a punishment, but acts as the educator and teacher of mankind.”

 

Elihu is our “bridge” to Christ. His is a theological response that unites justice and mercy — not by conflating them, but by employing them as part of a single grand plan.

 

His is a rejection of pure retribution and an embrace of prospective instrumentality, an exaltation of a God who is mighty, despises no one, and is firm in his purpose.

 

Elihu, who heralds the Lord Himself:

 

“Out of the north he comes in golden splendor;

God comes in awesome majesty.

The Almighty is beyond our reach and exalted in power;

in his justice and great righteousness, he does not oppress.”