Wednesday, December 19, 2018

Pope doesn’t back down from skepticism about gays in priesthood


Gay priest: The Church makes the lives of gay people 'hell'

“I don’t know why people are surprised that he’s Catholic,” said the author of a book-length interview with Pope Francis. “He hasn’t said anything that is not part of traditional doctrine.”

The comments made a splash, with some saying that it contradicts the gay-friendly image of the “Who am I to judge?” pope, while for others, it was a reinstatement of their belief that the Argentine pontiff is an anti-gay pope due to his repeated criticism of what he calls “gender ideology.”
The book from which those remarks were drawn, The Strength of Vocation, came to be after a four-hour interview Francis granted Spanish missionary priest Fernando Prado, who said he arrived for their scheduled meeting with 60 questions. The conversation took place Aug. 4 in the Santa Marta residence which is within Vatican grounds and where Francis has lived since the beginning of his pontificate.
Though the pope didn’t ask for it, Prado said he’d send the draft questions and answers along to make sure he was comfortable with the content.
“I sent him the distilled text on a Wednesday, during the Synod of Bishops on young people, faith and vocational discernment, which took place in October, and he called me on Saturday and told me he loved it,” Prado told Crux in Rome earlier this month.
The pope had very few changes to make, Prado said, and they were very specific things, like having the names of religious men and women he spoke about included in the book.
“I had told him, ‘Holy Father, there are some headlines here that could make people talk’,” Prado said he told the pontiff. “I’ve read it, and I agree with what I said, so go ahead,” was Francis’s response.
The priest has known the pope for several years now, as he was the editor of the Spanish editions of books compiling all the speeches and writings of then-Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio when Francis was the archbishop of Buenos Aires.
“I wasn’t surprised by the pope’s response to the question regarding homosexuals having access to the priesthood,” he said. “He doesn’t say anything beyond what the social doctrine of the Church says. And some in the gay world, the LGTBI community or gay lobby- because I believe there is a gay lobby that puts pressure worldwide, internationally, nationally and also in the ecclesial world- were disappointed because they had misunderstood other statements that the pope made earlier.”
“The Church has to welcome [gay] people, accompany them,” Prado said. “But one thing is to welcome people, another is to say that they have the right to be priests. First of all, no one has the right to be priests. It’s a call that comes from God that the Church confirms, and the Church sets the standard.”
“I don’t know why people are surprised that he’s Catholic,” Prado said of Francis. “He hasn’t said anything that is not part of traditional doctrine.”
According to Prado, what he describes as the “homosexual collective” saw itself “stopped” by Francis from “carrying their project forward,” but “this is the Church.”
Talking to Prado, the pontiff said that homosexuality within the walls of seminaries, convents and other religious places where clergy live is “a very serious question.”
“In our societies, it even seems homosexuality is fashionable. And this mentality, in some way, also influences the life of the Church,” the pontiff continued, in a book he reviewed in full in Spanish before it was printed.
He also spoke about the importance of the selection process when men want to go into seminary, saying that formators must look for “human and sentimental maturity.”
The pope also commented on a clergyman who had told him that having gays in Catholic religious housing “isn’t so grave” because it’s “only an expression of affection.”
That reasoning “is in error,” Francis told Prado. “In consecrated life and priestly life, there is no place for this kind of affection.”
He said candidates with “neuroses or strong unbalances” should not be accepted to the priesthood nor to other forms of consecrated life.
As he has in the past, the pontiff distinguished between what he sees as a lobby imposing an ideology and individual people, saying that gay Catholics contribute to the life of the Church, that cannot forget that they’re “persons who’ll live in the service of the Church, of the Christian community, of the people of God. Let’s never forget this perspective.”
Since Prado is a man of the print industry, he understood that the headlines would focus on the pope’s comments about gay people in the priesthood. However, had he been able to influence the media, he would have focused on the pope’s vision of religious life as a gift for the Church, and that the book is “a call to religious to live their consecration with joy and to look into their future with hope.”
“But hey, that is not a very journalistic headline…” he acknowledged. “But I think there are many interesting things, including that he addresses his concern over formation and the selection of candidates and human maturity as a whole, not only regarding homosexuality; clericalism in the Church; worldliness.”
“The pope is demanding of the religious,” Prado said. “On the one hand he encourages us, but on the other he demands of us. He wants for religious life to shine in the Church for what it has to be and for the requirement that we be faithful to our vocation. Religious life is a gift for the Church, but also a call for us to live with joy and to look to their future with hope.”


https://cruxnow.com/interviews/2018/12/19/pope-doesnt-back-down-from-skepticism-about-gays-in-priesthood/

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

Pope Francis warns against nationalism, xenophobia

Agence France-Presse

VATICAN CITY - Pope Francis has warned politicians of the dangers of exploiting nationalism and fear of foreigners to undermine the trust essential to their task of binding societies together, not dividing them.

Trust based on an "authentic political life, grounded in law and in frank and fair relations between individuals... is never easy to achieve," the pope said in a message released Tuesday, which will be used to mark World Peace Day on Jan. 1.

This is because "human relations are complex, especially in our own times, marked by a climate of mistrust rooted in the fear of others or of strangers, or anxiety about one's personal security," he said.
"Sadly, it is also seen at the political level, in attitudes of rejection or forms of nationalism that call into question the fraternity of which our globalized world has such great need.

"Today more than ever, our societies need 'artisans of peace'."

"Political addresses that tend to blame every evil on migrants and to deprive the poor of hope are unacceptable," he added in the message entitled: "Good politics at the service of peace."

Pope Francis also warned against corruption and the pursuit of personal ambition at the expense of wider society, saying that when rulers look out only for themselves, the future is compromised, especially for the younger generations, which become marginalized.

https://news.abs-cbn.com/overseas/12/19/18/pope-francis-warns-against-nationalism-xenophobia

Friday, December 7, 2018

Immaculate Conception and “the vertex of love”


 

Today, 8th December 2018, is the feast-day of the Immaculate Conception
 

“In the union of the Holy Spirit with her, not only does love bind these two beings, but the first of them

[the Holy Spirit] is all the love of the Most Holy Trinity, while the second [the Blessed Virgin Mary]

is all the love of creation, and thus in that union heaven is joined to earth, the whole heaven with

the whole earth, the whole of Uncreated Love with the whole of created love: this is the vertex of love”.

St. Maximilian Kolbe

 
 

Cheryl Dickow writes on:

 

Our Jewish Roots: The Immaculate Conception



From the time of Abraham’s response to God’s call to leave the country of his kinsmen, God began the process of preparing the way for the Messiah.  Abraham, after all, introduced to his pagan neighbors the objective truth of the one God: Creator of all that is, was and ever shall be.  He was being set aside for this intention.  Along with his wife, Sarah, Abraham is credited throughout Jewish teaching for converting pagan neighbors to the monotheistic faith of Judaism.  Abraham, being set aside for that purpose, was able to remain a vessel for God’s plan. 

Not only was Abraham a vessel for God, Abraham acted as an intercessor as well.  Consider his dialogue with God, in which God is prepared to pour out His wrath and punishment upon Sodom and Gomorrah.  Abraham beseeches God to withhold punishment if Abraham is able to find but a small handful of citizens who have not succumbed to the moral decay of their neighbors.  God enters into this dialogue because of Abraham’s faithfulness and the faith in which Abraham has lived his own life, following God. 

 

The evolution of God’s plan, which began in earnest with Abraham’s visible commitment to monotheism, continued throughout salvation history.  People, and even items, were often set aside, to be used in this plan for man’s deliverance.  Qadosh is the Hebrew word that means set aside, or separated, for a purpose.  Throughout the Old Testament, people and things had often been set aside for specific purposes. When God called upon Israel to be a people like no other and to be a kingdom of priests, those priests were “set aside” for specific duties.  Utensils, vessels, and garb that were meant for service at the altar of the temple were “set apart” and would not be used elsewhere, lest they be defiled.  So this “setting aside” was a common understanding of the Jewish people.  Abraham was “set aside” when he was asked to leave his homeland and the evolution of being set aside was underway.

 

When Mary is called the “Immaculate Conception” she is simply reflecting two thousand years of Jewish practice in which something meant for God’s use, for His salvific plan, is set aside.  It is not a new teaching but, rather, rests upon Jewish laws that are thousands of years old.  Objects used in worship were set aside from ordinary use.  Persons were set aside from their ordinary occupations to be devoted to the Lord’s service.  And finally Mary was set aside from the ordinary effects of original sin in order for her human body to be the vessel for Christ: thus the “Immaculate Conception.”  Additionally, just as these things — whether people or items — acted as intercessors between God and His people, so Mary acts as intercessor as well.  This is the culmination of thousands of years of preparation for the Messiah that began with Abraham’s being called from his homeland. 

[End of quote]

 
Stained Glass Window Franciscan Saint Maximilian Koble

 
The great Marian saint, Maximilian Kolbe, martyr of love at Auschwitz, wrote in a most inspired fashion on the Immaculate Conception.

The Polish saint asked the question:

“Who Are You, O Immaculate Conception?”

 

And that is the very title of this article by Jonathan Fleischmann:

https://saintmaximiliankolbe.com/who-are-you-o-immaculate-conception/


 

“Who are you, O Immaculate Conception?” asks St. Maximilian Maria Kolbe. The Knight of the Immaculata goes on:

 

Not God, for God has no beginning. Not Adam, made from the dust of the earth. Not Eve, drawn from Adam’s body. Nor is she the Incarnate Word who already existed from all eternity and who was conceived, but is not really a “conception.” Prior to their conception the children of Eve do not exist, hence they can more properly be called “conceptions”; and yet you, O Mary, differ from them too, because they are conceptions contaminated by original sin, whereas you are the one and only Immaculate Conception. ….

 

The Vertex of Love

 

In the return of all created things to God the Father (cf. Jn 1:1; 16:28), “the equal and contrary reaction,” says St. Maximilian Kolbe, “proceeds inversely from that of creation.” In creation, the Saint goes on to say, the action of God “proceeds from the Father through the Son and the Spirit, while in the return, by means of the Spirit, the Son becomes incarnate in [the Blessed Virgin Mary’s] womb and through Him love returns to the Father.” …. The Saint of Auschwitz goes on:

 

In the union of the Holy Spirit with her, not only does love bind these two beings, but the first of them [the Holy Spirit] is all the love of the Most Holy Trinity, while the second [the Blessed Virgin Mary] is all the love of creation, and thus in that union heaven is joined to earth, the whole heaven with the whole earth, the whole of Uncreated Love with the whole of created love: this is the vertex of love. ….

 

The image St. Maximilian employs here of action and equal-and-opposite reaction is taken from Newtonian mechanics … specifically the proposition known as Newton’s third law: “For every action force there is an equal-and-opposite reaction force.” Thus, we may visualize the image being employed by St. Maximilian Kolbe as two “bodies” in equilibrium, which meet at a single point of contact at the “center” of salvation history. The two contacting bodies represent heaven and earth; the uncreated and created orders; God and his creation. The contact point is the Immaculate Conception: the Vertex of Love. ….

 

It may seem very wrong to use an image of “force equilibrium” to represent the state of affairs between heaven and earth, because how can this state between God and his creation be in equilibrium? Isn’t God’s act of love so much greater than the return of his creation that no “equilibrium” would be possible? This would certainly be the case if it were not for Emmanuel, that is, God with us. Jesus, Who is truly man and truly God, belongs to both the created and uncreated orders simultaneously. In His person, Jesus is both the Son of Mary, fully human and like us in all ways except sin, and the Eternal Son of God the Father, infinite and equal in all ways to the Triune God.

 

The Created Immaculate Conception

 

It is clear that the love of Jesus, the Word made flesh Who is God, is by itself enough to “balance” the love of God. However, there is even more in the equation of love’s equilibrium than the love of the Son, infinite and sufficient in itself though it is. According to St. Maximilian, the perfect love of the Trinity meets an adequate response in the perfect love of the Immaculate, which is the name St. Maximilian gives to the Blessed Virgin Mary. How is it possible that Divine Love can find an adequate response in the love of a creature? It is possible precisely because of the name that the Virgin Mary can claim for herself. In 1854, the Blessed Virgin Mary proclaimed to St. Bernadette Soubirous: “I am the Immaculate Conception.” In the words of St. Maximilian, the Blessed Virgin is the Created Immaculate Conception, as the Holy Spirit is the Uncreated Immaculate Conception. In the words of St. Francis of Assisi, Mary is the Spouse of the Holy Spirit. …. St. Maximilian Kolbe, a true son of St. Francis, explains:

What kind of union is this? It is above all interior; it is the union of her very being with the being of the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit dwells in her, lives in her, from the first instant of her existence, and he will do so always, throughout eternity… This uncreated Immaculate Conception conceives divine life immaculately in the soul of Mary, his Immaculate Conception. The virginal womb of her body, too, is reserved for him who conceives there in time—everything material comes about according to time—the divine life of the God-Man. ….

 

The Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son as the perfect and infinite Love between the Father and the Son in the Eternal interior life of the Blessed Trinity. Thus, the Holy Spirit is truly all the love of the Most Holy Trinity. “Hence the Holy Spirit is an uncreated conception, an eternal one; he is the prototype of every sort of human conception in the universe… [He] is a most holy conception, infinitely holy, immaculate.” …. The Holy Spirit is also called the Complement of the Blessed Trinity, because He is the completion of the Trinity, not in “number” (quantitatively), but in essence (qualitatively).

When Mary, by the design of God before the creation of angels or the universe, and before the existence of sin or evil, was predestined in one and the same decree with Jesus Christ … she was predestined to be the Spouse of the Holy Spirit, and so was predestined to hold within herself all the love of creation. Thus, St. Maximilian says that the Blessed Virgin Mary, “inserted into the love of the Most Holy Trinity becomes, from the very first moment of her existence, always, forever, the Complement of the Most Holy Trinity.” …. We may paraphrase the thoughts of St. Maximilian Kolbe on the spousal relationship between the Holy Spirit and the Blessed Virgin Mary in the words of Fr. Peter Damian M. Fehlner:

 

In virtue of this spousal union formally denoted by the title Complement, Mary is able to enter as no other into the order of the hypostatic union, her soul being wholly divinized, because by the grace of the Immaculate Conception it has been ‘transubstantiated’ into the Holy Spirit. ….

 

Now that we have balanced the equation of love’s equilibrium twice over, we could certainly stop. However, there is good reason to continue. The order of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit reflects the order of God’s loving act of creation: initiated by the zeal of the Father, designed by the wisdom of the Son, and effected by the action of the Holy Spirit. This is the order referred to by St. Maximilian when he says “the equal and contrary reaction [i.e., the return of all creation to God] proceeds inversely from that of creation.”

Thus, in the response of creation to God the Father, we first have Mary, who is the perfect similitude (St. Bonaventure), transparent icon—or even quasi-incarnationof the Holy Spirit (St. Maximilian Kolbe) … but who is still a created person, with a created human nature. We have Jesus, Who is the Word Incarnate, the same Person as the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity, but Who is still in possession of a created human nature. St. Maximilian stops here, but must we stop here? I would dare to say that the analogy we have carried out so far on the inspiration of St. Maximilian Kolbe suggests an obvious completion. We have the completion of the earthly trinity in St. Joseph, who has been called the perfect icon of God the Father (St. Theresa of Avila, St. Bernadette Soubirous, St. Peter Julian Eymard). ….

 

The Icons of Love

 

In the return of all created things to God the Father, first in the order of time we find Mary, who is like the Holy Spirit quasi-incarnate. …. The Holy Spirit’s role in the Blessed Trinity is that of action, because all of God’s actions are acts of Love, and the Holy Spirit is the Love of God. According to St. Maximilian, the dual role of Mary is that of instrument, or Ancilla (handmaid). In every action of God in the order of Grace, Mary acts as an active instrument in her role as Mediatrix. She is also active in our Redemption—both the objective and subjective Redemption—in her role as Coredemptrix with Christ, again as an instrument of God. The word that Mary speaks to God is Fiat: let it be done to me according to thy Will.

Second in the order of time in creation’s return to God, we find Jesus, born of the Virgin Mary. Jesus is the Sun of Justice, as we know from the Liturgy. He took on human nature, suffered, and died on the cross so that God’s justice could be satisfied. Thus, Jesus Christ has the dual role of God’s justice and man’s satisfaction of God’s justice.

He is God’s justice as the Eternal Word, the Son of God the Father in eternity. He is the satisfaction of God’s justice as the Son of man, the Son of Mary and Joseph, the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world. In the words of Father Joachin Ferrer Arellano:

 

Although Sacred Scripture does not make use of the term satisfaction adopted by St. Anselm … to refer to the death of Christ, it employs equivalent concepts or those that imply and aptly express this classic and venerable theological category taken up by the Magisterium, not without sapiential inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Thus, e.g., for Jesus to die on behalf of the impious and sinners, means that it is in the death of Christ where the reconciliation of sinners with God is effected, in such a manner that, for this reason, the Death of Christ becomes the ransom, the propitiation and expiation for our sins. The Son of man has not come to be served, but to serve and give his life as a ransom for many (Mt 20:28). ….

 

Last in the order of time in creation’s return to God, we find St. Joseph, who is the icon of the Father. God the Father is the initiator of all things, both in the uncreated and the created order. As initiator, his role in the Blessed Trinity is especially that of holy zeal. The response of St. Joseph to the zeal of God the Father is obedience. Holy obedience is the only fitting return that a creature can make to God’s zeal. Moreover, far from being merely “passive,” it is only in this perfect, holy obedience that a true reflection of God’s zeal can be found in a creature. We know this, because we know that St. Joseph is the perfect icon of God the Father; and the Gospel tells us that every one of St. Joseph’s actions were the fruit of his perfect, holy obedience. In the words of St. Peter Julian Eymard:

 

When God sends an angel to charge him with the care of Mary in spite of the mystery which surrounds her maternity and troubles his humility, he obeys; when he is told to flee into Egypt under painful circumstances well calculated to fill him with worry and anxiety, he obeys without the slightest word of objection. On his return he has no idea where to go; naturally he heads for Bethlehem since the Child had been born there and God had not revealed otherwise. Not until he has reached the very gates of Judea does God advise him in a dream to return to Nazareth. Surely God could have warned him in advance, but it pleases Him to see these sacrifices accepted out of obedience. In every situation Joseph’s obedience is as simple as his faith, as humble as his heart, as prompt as his love; it neglects nothing; it is universal. ….

 

The Strategy

 

In the return of all created things to God the Father, it is under the leadership of St. Joseph, our Patriarch, and in imitation of him, that the individual members of the Church must, by the merits gained for us through the Redemptive Sacrifice of Jesus Christ, the Incarnate Word of God, be transubstantiated into Mary … who is the Virgo Ecclesia Facta (the Virgin-Made-Church). ….
It is only in this way, being transubstantiated into Mary, the Created Immaculate Conception, that we can be united to God as she is uniquely united to God, being transubstantiated with her into the Uncreated Immaculate Conception, who is the Holy Spirit. In virtue of this transubstantiation, we are possessed by the Immaculate, and we are thereby formed into a single community or Church sharing her personality. In the unsurpassable words of St. Maximilian Maria Kolbe, Martyr of Charity:

 

She is God’s. She belongs to God in a perfect way to the extent that she is as if a part of the most Holy Trinity, although she is a finite creature. Moreover she is not only a “handmaid,” a “daughter,” a “property,” a “possession,” etc., but also the Mother of God! Here one is seized with giddiness… she is almost above God, as a mother is above her sons who must respect her. The Immaculate is a Spouse of the Holy Spirit in an unspeakable way… She has the same Son as the heavenly Father has. What an ineffable family! We belong to her, to the Immaculate. We are hers without limits, most perfectly hers; we are, as it were, her. Through our mediation she loves the good God. With our poor heart she loves her divine Son. We become the mediators through whom the Immaculate loves Jesus. And Jesus, considering us her property and, as it were, a part of his beloved Mother, loves her in us and through us. What a lovely mystery!

 

 

Thursday, December 6, 2018

Euthanasia: Ripping the fabric of society apart







It was the experience of losing someone he knew to assisted-suicide that propelled Professor Peter Kurti into advocating against legalised euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.
“I felt quite angry actually. I felt indignant,” Prof Kurti told The Catholic Weekly. “His family had been devastated and I found myself thinking, how can you possibly think that this is dying with dignity?”
It was eminent Melbourne historian, John Hirst, who had taken his life, with the help of Exit International—the “right to die” advocacy group began by Dr Philip Nitschke, a long-time proponent of assisted-suicide.
Prof Kurti says Hirst was a member of Exit and had openly discussed how he planned to end his own life with their assistance.

“He feared that his mental powers were not as sharp as they had been.”
“This was a man in his early 70’s, in good mental health, a very bright man, so I didn’t expect it to happen quickly… I remember saying to him, John, whatever you do, just make sure you tell us [when] you’re going to do this, so it’s not a real shock. And that was the last time I saw him. When I learnt he’d died I knew instantly what he’d done.”
“I didn’t know him well, but I knew him well enough to be affronted by this manner of death… it had a tremendous impact on immediate friends and colleagues and on the family.”
“I thought, if people who are opposed to this don’t say something, this is just going to become an acceptable practice in our society.”









“Physician-assisted suicide will become a treatment option. It will mean the medical response to suffering will be to eliminate the sufferer.”
The Senior Research Fellow at the Centre for Independent Studies, and Adjunct Associate Professor in the School of Law at Sydney’s Notre Dame University, has recently had his latest book published—Euthanasia: Putting the Culture to Death.
His book—part of Connor Court Publishing’s The Snowflake Chronicles series dedicated to flouting political correctness—is timely, as the latest push for legalised euthanasia and assisted-suicide in Australia is well and truly underway.
The state of Victoria legalised euthanasia late last year. Western Australia has declared its intention to follow suit and Queensland has just announced it will conduct an inquiry into whether it should legalise assisted-suicide. NSW Senator, David Leyonhjelm, is calling for a restoration of voluntary euthanasia in the ACT and NT, and euthanasia legislation was narrowly defeated in the NSW Parliament by just one vote earlier this year.
A woman holds up a sign during a rally against assisted suicide in 2016 on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Ontario. PHOTO: CNS
While Victoria’s legislation restricts access to terminally ill Victorian adults with less than six months to live, Prof Kurti says ultimately it won’t matter, because the slippery-slope effect is very real. Once you legalise killing human beings, any restrictions will inevitably be eroded over time.
“There is a slippery-slope as the categories expand,” he said. “If euthanasia becomes available for one section of the population, it will be very difficult to justify not extending it to others. If one group says I’m suffering in a particular way—from a physical terminal illness—how do we then say to people who are suffering from non-terminal illness that their suffering doesn’t count?”
A case in point is that of David Goodall, the 104 year-old Perth man who travelled to Switzerland earlier this year and ended his own life. In Switzerland, assisted-suicide is legally available to anyone who testifies in writing that they are seeking to die of their own free will.
“He was elderly and frail with diminishing capacities but he wasn’t terminally ill. He was just tired of life.”
Professor Peter Kurti. PHOTO: Giovanni Portelli
“Nitschke said that David was the first person he knew of who fitted the requirement of old age, it’s a unique situation… where a person is simply trying to exercise what they see as an absolute right to put an end to their life.”
Dr Kurti said both euthanasia and assisted-suicide overturn an important taboo in human societies—“Euthanasia” being the killing of someone by medical staff, while the term “assisted-suicide” refers to supplying someone with the advice and resources to take their own life.
Activists protest against the proposed statutory amendment legalizing the euthanasia of young children in 2014 in Brussels. PHOTO: CNS
“If we loosen that taboo around the taking of human life, if we see the treatment of human frailty as being the killing of a human being, we are doing irreparable harm to our culture.”
“Once the answer to suffering has become the medical elimination of the sufferer, it’s hard to see how any limits can be placed around the human experience of suffering. Doctors are to heal and not to harm. The motive of compassion is not enough to justify extending the role of doctors to include the act of killing.”
“When society permits some of its citizens to be killed, it tears the fabric of community and threatens to put the culture itself to death.”




https://www.catholicweekly.com.au/euthanasia-ripping-the-fabric-of-society-apart/

Wednesday, December 5, 2018

Sydney University’s descent into a very dark ignorance. Part Two: More from Dr Bella d’Abrera



Image may contain: 1 person, smiling, text and close-up





  
 
“This is the opposite to the point of a university… this is creating
a generation of people who won’t know anything”.
 
Dr Bella d’Abrera
 
 
 
 
The IPA’s Dr Bella d’Abrera joined The Young IPA Podcast to discuss her recent article in the Daily Telegraph on the University of Sydney’s ‘Unlearn Campaign’:

 
Here’s what she had to say:
 
“They have to unlearn everything that they know. They have to break the old rules, and then start again. It’s a crazy idea of starting at Year Zero.”
 
“Everything they know about climate, about love, about medicine. Everything that they know, they have to unlearn.”
 
“This is the opposite to the point of a university…this is creating a generation of people who won’t know anything. And it’s quite terrifying, because how are they going to make decisions if they don’t know anything? How are they going to be leaders of the country?” ….
 
[End of quote]
 
The ‘art’ of unlearning is not restricted to Australian university students, however.
For, as Dr. d’Abrera will go on to remark in a more recent article for The Daily Telegraph (Sydney), “The great unlearning going on in Australian schools”:
 
Image result for the great unlearning going on in d'abrera
 
“What a coincidence: Even as our children are being encouraged to become ever more politically active for progressive causes, their skills in literacy and maths are declining …”.
 
Image result for schoolchildren protest global warming