The Sheer Silliness of Teilhard de Chardin
Part Six (b):
Reader’s comment on Teilhard’s ‘silliness’
“Teilhard saw no clear dividing line between life and non-life.
Rather, all of reality coheres
in a single reality”.
John Ryan
Haule
Hans-Georg Lundahl writes in an e-mail (6 Jul 2018):
I agree Teilhard was .... I think "silly" is too good a word
for it.
C S Lewis once seems to have said on Teilhard's "before life, there was pre-life" that before you light a lamp there is of course "pre-light" but sensible people call that darkness.
Have you included that reference yet?
….
Damien Mackey replies: No, that is a new one for me, but thanks for alerting me to it.
….
John
Ryan Haule has written on this particular quirk of Teilhardianism (Jung
in the 21st Century Volume Two: Synchronicity and Science, Volume Two, p. 173):
The paleontologist Pierre Teilhard de Chardin
(1881–1955) developed probably the most comprehensive idea of a psychoid field in his book, The Phenomenon of Man (1959), an
argument deeply rooted in evolutionary biology and inspired by his own
mystical Catholicism—although it is an argument the Catholic
Church still regards as “dangerous to the faith. Teilhard's argument resembles Jung's proposal that amoeba has
something fundamental to tell us about the psychoid realm. Teilhard
said, “By means of the cell, the molecular world 'appears in person,'
touching, passing into, and disappearing
in the higher constructions of
life” (Teilhard de Chardin 1959: 81). Teilhard
saw no clear dividing line between life and non-life. Rather, all of
reality coheres in a single reality.
What we have long called “life” and treated
as an exceptional development unique to this blue planet has
inevitable precursors: “a 'pre-life' [that extends] as far back before [life] as the eye can see” (Teilhard
de Chardin 1959: 57). Teilhard draws
our attention to a planetary stratum beginning with mud and extending up
through water and the atmosphere, a several-mile-thick shell about the earth, filled
with “ultramicro grains of protein”.
He says, “If pre-life has already emerged in the atom, are not these myriads of large molecules just what we would
expect?” (1959: 73).
No comments:
Post a Comment