dates Gospels early
Part Two:
Institut Catholique de Paris ignores Carmignac
“The Catholic weekly Il Sabato has been hunting down
his manuscripts. It discovered that
Fr. Carmignac’s entire archive is to be
found at the Institut Catholique in Paris where he
had taught. In all these years, the Institut
Catholique has taken care not to tend to the publication of those pre-announced
works, and, above all, it has prohibited people
from seeing the material when they ask to
see it ...”.
The Wanderer
In the 1990’s, colleague Frits
Albers (RIP), PH.B, wrote about what he considered to be the “betrayals” perpetrated
by Paul Cardinal Poupard, the Archbishop of Paris, including his complete snub
of the research of Fr. Jean Carmignac.
...
History
has recorded several major betrayals by Cardinal Paul Poupard, Archbishop of
Paris and president of its Institut Catholique. I will briefly describe two of
them here as an introduction to his major one, his ‘resolution’
of the Galileo Case.
PART ONE:
WHY I MISTRUST CARD. PAUL POUPARD
Here
follows the official text of this “public put-down”, issued by the Holy See
press office on July 11, 1981, as it appeared in the Osservatore Romano of July
20 1981, mentioning Archbishop [by then not yet Cardinal] Paul Poupard by name.
The
letter sent by the Cardinal Secretary of State to His Excellency Mons. Poupard
on the occasion of the centenary of the birth of Fr. Teilhard de Chardin has
been interpreted in a certain section of the press as a revision of previous
stands taken by the Holy See in regard to this author, and in particular of the
Monitum of the Holy Office of 30 June 1962, which
pointed out that the work of the author contained ‘ambiguities and grave
doctrinal errors’.
The
question has been asked whether such an interpretation is well founded. After
having consulted the Cardinal Secretary of State and the Cardinal Prefect of
the Sacred Congregation of the Faith, which, by order of the Holy Father, had
been duly consulted beforehand about the letter in question, we are in a
position to reply in the negative. Far from being a revision of the previous
stands of the Holy See, Cardinal Casaroli’s letter expresses reservations in
various passages - and these reservations have been passed over in silence by
certain newspapers - reservations which refer precisely to the judgment given
in the Monitum of June 1962, even though this document is not explicitly
mentioned.
The
second example of betrayal involving the Institut Catholique
of Paris and its president, Archbishop Paul Poupard, centres on interference
with the dissemination of truth by means of the direct and wilful suppression of
Catholic scholarship in favour of a free and unencumbered promotion of
doctrinal errors. The scandal appeared in the March 19, 1992 edition of the
American Catholic paper The Wanderer, quoting two
other major European Catholic periodicals, 30 Days and
Il Sabato.
Reporting
a scandal: An
editorial in the current issue of 30 Days magazine (issue no. 2), titled “Scandal at the Institut Catholique” raises some tough
questions about the openness of modern biblical scholars to research which
offers evidence that the Gospels were written by A.D. 50.
Reporting
on investigative work conducted by the Italian Catholic weekly Il Sabato the editorial asks why the Institut Catholique in
Paris will not allow to be printed, or even acknowledge the existence of, the
biblical scholarship of Fr. Jean Carmignac.
Fr.
Carmignac, until his death in 1986, was one of the world’s leading experts in
Hebrew and Aramaic, and his extensive research in language and the Fathers of
the Church led him to believe Matthew, Mark, and Luke had written their Gospels
by A.D. 50.
In
addition, Carmignac noted the scholarship of 49 other recognised experts who
agreed with him, but whose works also had either been ignored or censored or
else they did not dare wage a battle in the name of their scientific
conviction.
“For
the consequences”, stated the 30 Days editorial,
“would have revolutionised the dominant exegetical trends today. Many ideas,
whose certainty is taken for granted today, would have crumbled ... If the
Synoptic Gospels were written in a Semitic language it means they were written
soon after Jesus’ years on earth, when the protagonists were still alive. It
means that the Synoptic Gospels are the testimonies of people who saw and
heard, of witnesses to the facts. It means they are not late elaborations by
anonymous transcribers of popular traditions”.
In
1983. Fr. Carmignac published a small book containing his findings and
conclusions, and promised a later book which he described as “more convincing
than ever and, I hope, irrefutable”.
But
at that time an effort began to bury his work, the editorial said, under hefty
shovelfuls of earth ... Six years after his death, none of these texts has ever
been published. An impenetrable curtain of silence has fallen on Fr. Carmignac
and his work. The Catholic weekly Il Sabato has been
hunting down his manuscripts. It discovered that Fr. Carmignac’s entire archive
is to be found at the Institut Catholique in Paris where he had taught. In all
these years, the Institut Catholique has taken care not to tend to the
publication of those pre-announced works, and, above all, it has prohibited
people from seeing the material when they ask to see it ...
One
of the 49 scholars mentioned here by the late Fr. Jean Carmignac is, no doubt,
Claude Tresmontant whose magnificent book on that very same topic, The Hebrew Christ, carries a lengthy foreword by the Most
Reverend Jean Charles Thomas, Bishop of Ajaccio, dated May 1, 1983: three years
before the death of Fr. Jean Camignac. In his Foreword Bishop Thomas refers specifically
to the same general state of affairs as was reported by the three Catholic
papers mentioned above. There is no change of heart in either the ‘Institut
Catholique’ or its president, Paul Poupard ...
No comments:
Post a Comment