Tuesday, August 9, 2016

Pediatricians back Pope Francis on ‘gender theory’

/data/news/7691/file/realname/images/p05__pope_with_kids.jpg


According to the most recent studies, the pope’s views are not only theologically orthodox, but scientifically sound.
….


Although LGBT leadership has decried Pope Francis’ supposed ignorance and insensitivity regarding transgenderism, a recent paper from a group of prominent pediatricians suggests that the pope may have science solidly on his side.
Several LGBT activists criticized Pope Francis after he denounced attempts to teach children that gender is fluid and can be chosen, rather than a biological fact and a gift from God. In a meeting with Polish bishops during World Youth Day, the pope bemoaned the infiltration of “gender theory” into educational materials for children.
“Today, schools are teaching children—children!—that everyone can choose their own sex. And why is this being taught? Because their textbooks are chosen by the people and institutions that give money. This is ideological colonization, promoted by very influential nations. This is terrible,” the pope said.
Sarah McBride, a transgender woman and National Press Secretary of the pro-LGBT Human Rights Campaign, said that Francis’s words were “not only hurtful, and frankly harmful, but really demonstrating a misunderstanding of what it means to be transgender.”
Francis DeBernardo, the executive director of New Ways Ministry, a Catholic LGBT advocacy group, also responded immediately to the pope’s remarks, suggesting that he was ignorant concerning the nature of transgenderism.
“Pope Francis’ shocked lament about schools teaching children they can choose their gender says more about the pope’s knowledge of LGBT issues than it does about the reality of gender identity,” DeBernardo said in a statement.
“Nobody chooses a gender identity. They discover it. Transgender people come to know themselves in a process is [sic] similar to the way that lesbian, gay, and bisexual people discover their sexual orientation,” he said.
Despite DeBernardo’s claims, recent clinical studies suggest that gender identity—an individual’s awareness of being male or female, sometimes referred to as an individual’s “experienced gender”—is not an innate component of human psychology that can be “discovered,” but is fundamentally determined by a series of post-natal experiences, influences and choices.
A paper released this past week by the American College of Pediatricians on gender dysphoria (GD) in children—a psychological condition in which children experience a marked incongruence between their experienced gender and their biological sex—suggests that Pope Francis was fundamentally correct in his criticism of gender theory.
“The norm for human development is for an individual’s thoughts to align with physical reality; for an individual’s gender identity to align with biologic sex,” the doctors assert. People who identify as “feeling like the opposite sex” remain biological men or biological women.
“GD is a problem that resides in the mind not in the body. Children with GD do not have a disordered body—even though they feel as if they do,” they note.
(The American College of Pediatricians is a socially conservative group of health care professionals that broke from the American Academy of Pediatrics, the main professional body in the field, over its support for gay adoption.)
The largest study ever of twin transsexual adults found that only 20 percent of identical twins both identified as transgender, despite their identical DNA. Since identical twins contain 100 percent of the same DNA from conception, and develop in exactly the same prenatal environment, if gender identity were innate, the concordance rates would be close to 100 percent—rather than 20 percent.
According to the ACP report, twin studies alone disprove the theory of an “innate gender identity” arising from prenatally “feminized” or “masculinized” brains trapped in the wrong body. This theory is rather “an ideological belief that has no basis in rigorous science,” the doctors assert.
Moreover, they continue, studies have shown that gender dysphoria among children is radically reduced when they are not encouraged to impersonate the opposite sex. Encouraging gender fluidity and identity experimentation among children is one of the primary causes of gender dysphoria.
This factor justifies the pope’s reaction to school textbooks that suggest that children be encouraged to experiment with gender as if their sexuality were not biologically predetermined.
The physicians state that the literature regarding the treatment of childhood gender dysphoria is heavily based upon clinical case studies, and yet these studies “suggest that social reinforcement, parental psychopathology, family dynamics, and social contagion facilitated by mainstream and social media, all contribute to the development and/or persistence of GD in some vulnerable children.”
On numerous occasions, Pope Francis has reaffirmed Catholic teaching that God creates human beings as male and female, and that young people should be taught to embrace the sexuality that God gave them.
In his letter on marriage and the family, Amoris Laetitia (“The Joy of Love”), Pope Francis said that sex education should teach “respect and appreciation” for sexual differences, as a way of helping the young to overcome self-absorption.
This respect includes self-acceptance and learning to embrace the body one is born with, rather than playing with fictional identities that deny reality.
“An appreciation of our body as male or female,” he added, is “necessary for our own self-awareness in an encounter with others different from ourselves.”
According to the most recent studies, the pope’s views are not only theologically orthodox, but scientifically sound…..
Taken from: https://cruxnow.com/commentary/2016/08/09/pediatricians-back-pope-francis-gender-theory/
     

Monday, August 8, 2016

Albert Einstein’s Parallel Universe


https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/proxy/AVvXsEig91EU4kqv48dEBhvxUeOAORd5lOJzbMf85CreErBaTK9kTo2XL2IfzwvYCPNKie3nZPo4GKdUFmDMHEyG-dspjGuds615XCu_SmDQUuEetkSIhO_QLFXuMxOzlSjVuTa_Pav9NdJiKd9ZGQD5FoVxmhxudoWsiP3c=

 

by

 

Damien F. Mackey

 

 

 

“Anxious theologians scan the latest scientific theories to see if they do or do not support the existence of God. Grave scientists issue their pontifical pronouncements. Sir James Jeans tells us that God is a great mathematician; Einstein says ‘God is slick but not mean’; Laplace, answering Napoleon who taxed him with not mentioning God in his Mécanique Céleste, said: ‘I have no need of that hypothesis’.”

 

Gavin Ardley,

Aquinas and Kant

 

 

 

 

Recently I tuned in to watch an SBS TV documentary with the title “Inside Einstein’s Mind”, and I was intrigued to learn that Einstein had managed, with his theory of General Relativity, to unlock the laws of nature.

This documentary is being promoted in the following laudatory terms:

 

In November 1915, Einstein published his greatest work: General Relativity, the theory that transformed our understanding of nature's laws and the entire history of the cosmos. This documentary tells the story of Einstein's masterpiece, from the simple but powerful ideas at the heart of relativity, to the revolution in cosmology still playing out in today's labs, revealing Einstein's brilliance as never before. (From the US) (Documentary) G CC

 

One had to marvel at Albert Einstein’s mathematical skill, his ability to think outside the square and to embark upon a new course, his powers of concentration, and his tenacity.

But did he really succeed in coming to grips with the laws of nature and the origins and history of the cosmos?

Is the warp and woof of Einstein’s universe, with its lumpiness and bumpiness, really the way that the universe is, or the way of Einstein’s own imagination?

Can God be defined by an elaborate physico-mathematical equation?

 

Gavin Ardley well summed up the nature of the new theoretical physics in his classic book, Aquinas and Kant: the foundations of the modern sciences (1950).

I take here a part of his:

 

Chapter IV

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PROCRUSTEAN SCIENCE

 

 

The ‘Otherness’ of Modern Physics

 

Post-Galilean physical science is cut off from the rest of the world and is the creation of man himself. Consequently the science, in itself, has no immediate metaphysical foundations, and no metaphysical implications, in spite of popular beliefs to the contrary. These beliefs arise from the failure to realise the science’s ‘otherness’, that it belongs to the categorial order and not to the real order.

Only that which belongs to the real order is directly linked with metaphysics. The ancient and medieval science of physics belongs to this real order, and is, in principle, an integral part of philosophy in general. It has metaphysical foundations and metaphysical implications. [Footnote: This is not to say that all the particular Aristotelean doctrines of the Earth, the Skies, the Heavens and so on, are essential to Aristotelean metaphysics. They are integrated with metaphysics only in their general intention, and not in particular formulation. They could be modified without necessitating any change in metaphysical principles since the principles of metaphysics are founded on more general grounds. Many of the particular Aristotelean opinions about phenomena were abandoned in the 17th century with the increasingly detailed knowledge of Nature. Galileo’s Dialogues on the Two Great Systems of the World is a classic account of this revision of detailed theories of phenomena. Galileo himself, unlike many of his more extravagant followers, generally pursued this revision with considerable moderation. (See Ch. XVII). He is careful to distinguish what is true an abiding in Aristotle from what is erroneous and non-essential.]

But the ‘new science’ shifted across by degrees into the categorial order and consequently severed its immediate link with metaphysics. Few people were aware of this, [Footnote: See Ch. XVII on the enlightened views of such men as Cardinal Bellarmine in the very early days of the movement. Unfortunately, Bellarmine’s wise observations were forgotten in later years. See, too, Ch. VI on Immanuel Kant, who held the clue in the hollow of his hand, but by excess destroyed it.] least of all the physicists themselves. The general run of physicists and philosophers have gone on writing learned works on the metaphysical foundations, and more particularly the metaphysical implications, of modern physics, oblivious to this change of character. If the theory of the nature of modern physics put forward in this book is correct, then both these enquiries are vain.

Works on the supposed metaphysical foundations of modern physics may have some value however, even if not in the sense intended by the authors. For, although logically the supposed foundations are not there, yet psychologically the metaphysical background may well have prompted the physicist to introduce this or that Procrustean bed. It is one of the sources of inspiration. [Footnote: See Ch. XI on Scientific Method.] Such enquiries then are of great interest to the historian of science as indicating one possible factor which led physicists to do what they in fact did. But they do not in any way provide a metaphysical foundation for the science, since a categorial science has no such foundation, dwelling apart, as it does from the real world. [Footnote: Such a work is the valuable study of Burtt: The Metaphysical Foundaions of Modern Science (London, 1925). We might say that the significance of this work is not logical, as Burtt apparently intended, but psychological and historical. It is significant that Burtt practically ignores Kant and his Copernican revolution, which is of vital importance in this matter and leads to quite different conclusions from Burtt’s (see Ch. VI).

Reference should be made to E. W. Strong: Procedures and Metaphysics (Univ. of California Press, 1936) for an examination of the origin of modern physics from the non-metaphysical point of view advocated in this work. Strong writes (pp. 10-11):

 

The operational autonomy of science and the irrelevance of the metaphysical tradition was a conclusion arising from, rather than being a premise leading to, the present study. The theory with which the inquiry began was not confirmed by the evidence, for let it be confessed at the outset that the original intention was to consolidate the claim that the Platonic tradition was the metaphysical godfather of modern scientific thought. The study of the scientific work and opinion of the early-modern period conjoined with a correlated study of the mathematical aspect of the Platonic tradition revealed that the original theory was untenable. The problems of mathematicians and physical investigators were found to be methodological rather than proceeding from, or based on, metaphysical concepts. The meaning of concepts employed by mathematicians and scientists in their work was found to be established in the limited operations and subject matter constituting their science. The conclusion finally driven home was the conviction that the achievements of Galileo and his predecessors were in spite of rather than because of prior and contemporary metaphysical theories of mathematics.

 

This contention that there are two lines of activity, one of autonomous procedures, and the other of metaphysics, is diametrically opposed to Burtt’s thesis of homogeneity. Strong goes on to develop it with a wealth of historical evidence. Strong’s conclusions from his examination of the origins of modern mathematical-physical science in the 16th and 17th centuries lend powerful support to our basic contention that there are two orders: an autonomous order of physico-mathematical science, and a real order which is the province of metaphysics. The contention as advanced here is founded on an examination of the nature of physical science as we have it today. Strong’s historical examination of origins is complementary to, and confirmatory of, the present work.]

While discussions of the metaphysical foundations of modern physics are comparatively rare, discussions of its supposed implications are extremely popular. In fact the implications of science are the happy hunting grounds of generations of philosophers, and physicists turned amateur philosophers.

Anxious theologians scan the latest scientific theories to see if they do or do not support the existence of God. Grave scientists issue their pontifical pronouncements. Sir James Jeans tells us that God is a great mathematician; Einstein says ‘God is slick but not mean’; Laplace, answering Napoleon who taxed him with not mentioning God in his Mécanique Céleste, said: ‘I have no need of that hypothesis’.

Puzzled philosophers delve into the intricacies of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle to determine if man does or does not possess free will, or to see if the law of causality remains valid, or if it has to be replaced by statistical probability.

[Footnote: As representative of a multitude of contemporary philosophers, let us quote one of the most acute, John Wisdom:

 

In general philosophers concern themselves with paradoxes arising from facts that come under their observation. It is important that they should be alive to the paradoxes arising from quantum facts. Such facts cannot be shelved as merely technical or as belonging to a special department; they are facts along with all the other more familiar facts about nature they are no less real because revealed by complicated laboratory apparatus than are those revealed by the human eye. (Mind, Jan. 1947, p. 81)

 

These remarks of Wisdom’s are largely vitiated by the author’s failure to take into account the Procrustean character of physics. He is tacitly assuming a realist theory or a passive phenomenalism (Ch. XVIII). ….

As an amusingly ironic account of the extravagances into which popular opinion is led by hypostatising the world of physics, let us quote from Aldous Huxley’s Time Must Have a Stop (London, 1945), Ch. 8.

 

‘As I was saying, Mr Barnack, everyone ought to know something of Einstein’.

‘Even those who can’t understand what he’s talking about?’

‘But they can, the other protested. ‘It’s only the mathematical techniques that are difficult. The principle is simple – and after all, it’s the understanding of the principle that affects values and conduct’.

Eustace laughed aloud.

‘I can just see my mother-in-law changing her values and conduct to fit the principle of relativity!’

‘Well of course she is rather elderly’, the other admitted. ‘I was thinking more of people who are young enough to be flexible. For example, that lady who acts as Mrs Gamble’s companion …’

‘… Mathematically speaking, almost illiterate’, the young man was saying. ‘But that doesn’t prevent her from realizing the scope and significance of the Einsteinian revolution’.

‘And what a revolution’, he went on with mounting enthusiasm. ‘Incomparably more important than anything that had happened in Russia or Italy. For this was the revolution that had changed the whole course of scientific thinking, brought back idealism, integrated mind into the fabric of Nature, put an end for ever to the Victorians’ nightmare universe of infinitesimal billiard balls’.

‘Too bad’, said Eustace in parenthesis. ‘I really loved those little billiard balls’.]

 

 

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

Girls not allowed at Cheltenham Girls High

  Image result for


 

Cheltenham Girls High: Teachers at exclusive girls school told to preach gender neutral

 
TEACHERS at an all-girls school in northwest Sydney have been asked to  stop  referring  to  their students as “girls”, ladies” and “women”and to instead use “gender-neutral” ­language.
The request to teachers at Cheltenham Girls High School came in a staff meeting last term to discuss ­implementation of the controversial Safe Schools anti-bullying program for lesbian, gay and transgender (LGBTI) students.
Also at the meeting, a copy of the NSW anti-discrimination act was displayed, according to an insider, and staff were informed by the teacher chairing the meeting that if they did not support decisions of LGBTI students they would be breaking the law, would be considered homophobic and were not welcome by the school.

media_cameraThe exclusive Cheltenham Girls School.
Education Minister Adrian Piccoli has asked his department to ­investigate the allegations.
Some concerned parents have started a petition and complained to teachers and to their local Liberal MP Damien Tudehope, saying their children feel marginalised and ­excluded if they don’t participate in LGBTI activities at the elite, ethnically diverse public high school.
Teachers have helped a group of students at the school form an LGBTI “Queer-straight alliance” club to promote LGBTI issues, such as Wear it Purple Day.
Other events included the temporary removal of an Aboriginal flag from a flagpole inside school grounds last month, which was ­replaced with a rainbow flag at half- mast for a week to commemorate a US terrorist attack on a gay nightclub in Orlando.
“(Some of) the parents are saying that at (LGBTI) events like Rainbow Day and Purple Day that if their daughter doesn’t comply with what they perceive as the school directions their daughter is ostracised,” Mr Tudehope said.
He said parents from another school in his electorate had also approached him with similar concerns.

media_cameraEpping State Liberal MP Damien Tudehope said he has spoken with concerned parents.

One mother who met principal Susan Bridge to express her concerns about the Safe Schools program was dissatisfied with the meeting, which resulted in the principal sending her a copy of the NSW Department of Education’s policy on homophobia.
Ms Bridge did not respond to a request for comment yesterday.
Mr Piccoli said: “I have asked the ­department to investigate these complaints promptly, in accordance with departmental policy.
“All schools are required to conform with federal government guidelines. I am advised all schools are following these guidelines. I have asked the secretary to confirm this is the case at all schools, including Cheltenham Girls High School.”
Dr Kevin Donnelly, senior ­research fellow at the Australian Catholic University and co-author of the Review of the Australian Curriculum, said the use of gender-­neutral language such as “students” in place of “girls” and “boys” was part of the Safe Schools agenda to erase gender differences.
“They say it’s hetero-normative to talk about men and women, boys and girls, because it’s reinforcing a binary stereotype,” he said. “I disagree with all of that, but I can understand why the school would be doing it. Gender ideology is undermining any traditional sense of what it is to be a man or a woman.”

Taken from: http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/cheltenham-girls-high-teachers-at-exclusive-girls-school-told-to-preach-gender-neutral/news-story/c9777cad2f4e9bdccde15d3972820d21

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Pope Francis: The Legacy of Vatican II




New book says Vatican II key to understanding Pope Francis



by Eduardo Echeverria - published by Lectio Publishing, 2015


 

A Book Review by Father John McCloskey


 

Pope Francis presents a great puzzlement to many of the faithful, particularly those Catholics who are accustomed to the clarity of Pope Emeritus Benedict and his holy predecessor St. John Paul. As a result, those Catholics who are faithful to the teachings of the Church have a difficult time penetrating the meaning behind the current pope's rhetoric. This is understandable, given that he has so far produced only two encyclicals – one on Faith (written with the help of Pope Benedict) and the second a complex reflection on the environment.

He is most misunderstood, however, because of the secular media, which, stoked by the Internet, constantly portray him as a man who in some way or other intends to change the fundamental teachings of the Catholic Church, particularly in the area of marital life.

….

Many seem to hope that, somehow, Pope Francis is going to give in to radical changes in sexual morality, especially with regard to the divorced and remarried and on homosexuality.

 

Well-formed Catholics think this is impossible – and Francis's words, at least on homosexuality, seem to confirm that belief. But partly owing to Francis's own off-the-cuff statements, the impression persists.

….

Ironically – and as a witness to the new universality of the Church – the strongest and most outspoken defenders of Catholic teaching on this matter are African Catholics. The hierarchies of the Catholic dioceses in Sub-Saharan Africa insist that the Church preach and encourage people to follow its treasury of teachings on faith and morals. Given the apparent decay of the West, the Africans constitute perhaps the best example of faithful and fruitful Catholic communities in the world.

Which brings us to Eduardo Echeverria and his just released book Pope Francis: The Legacy of Vatican II. George Weigel, the well-known Catholic thinker – and friend and biographer of St. John Paul – describes the author as one of the liveliest and most insightful thinkers practicing the ancient craft of theology in the United States today. His book sheds new light on the Catholic Church and on Pope Francis himself at this challenging moment in history. Echeverria is a professor of philosophy and systematic theology at Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit.

What Echeverria shows is that the Holy Father, Pope Francis, is [a] man of the Second Vatican Council and faithful, in the best sense, to its teaching. As The Catholic Thing's Robert Royal notes in his Foreword to this volume, through a careful reading of Jorge Bergoglio's writings prior to being elected pope, Echeverria has discovered there two key interpretive elements. First, the pope very much believes that the Church should judge between "yes" and "no," whatever the media would like to believe about "Who am I to judge?" And second, the future pope leant heavily on the notion of the pueblo fiel, ("faithful people") in Argentina, by which he meant a genuinely popular Catholicism that was also profoundly faithful to the Catholic tradition. The author includes chapters that detail his dealings with traditionalists and with the liberal and progressive sectors of the Church.

Echeverria also devotes space to the pope's particular mission of encouraging Protestants and others outside the Catholic faith to engage with Rome. In addition, he describes the great attractiveness of Francis to people throughout the world – which we may hope could eventually draw many back to the Church that Christ founded.

Contrary to public impressions, Francis frequently addresses that part of Christian life that is a spiritual "battle" within the soul of each Christian (for example, battling gossip, prejudice, and self-indulgence). But he's also demonstrated the importance of showing joy and sharing our faith with family and friends, as well as in the workplace.

…. Given the ongoing collapse of Christianity in United States, Pope Francis' teachings and the degree to which he is properly understood will play a large role in the fate of America, which has already begun the long, grueling process of electing a new president.  

These elections will also, of course, have repercussions for the selection of new members of the Supreme Court, which has done so much damage to what at one time was a Christian land, most recently by the Obergefell decision allowing same-sex marriage.

Perhaps this extraordinary gift from God that is Pope Francis will awaken us to the extraordinary treasure of the Church that Christ founded. In any case, this book will help confirm for all who read it that the Church, in one way or another, will prevail until the end of time, as its Founder has assured us.

 


Monday, June 20, 2016

Injustices that the Prophet Amos Excoriated a Reality in Australia


2016-06-18_0049

 

Part Three:
Song for George Bender


by

 

Damien F. Mackey

 

 

 

 

TV program, 60 Minutes looked at the battleground between Queensland farmers

and coal seam gas companies.

 

 

 

Keep Out!


What would you do if someone walked into your backyard, dug a big hole and put a fence around it with a sign saying ‘No Trespassing’? In all likelihood you’d shout and scream and call the police. But what if when the police came they threatened to arrest you, not those who wrecked your property and locked you out? In many parts of rural Australia this is the outrageous scenario now playing out between farmers and big gas companies, whose relentless – often ruthless – quest for new sources of gas seems to have no limits. In a special 60 Minutes investigation, Michael Usher reveals evidence showing the high-pressure, secret tactics used by some gas companies which are driving hard-working country folk from their land. Queensland farmer Kane Booth used to have a multi-million-dollar cattle business until three coal seam gas wells were drilled on his property. He says the wells affected the water supply on his land, rendering it useless for fattening his cattle. He’s now been forced to abandon the property and sell off his herd. Not surprisingly, Kane and his young family are devastated, but have vowed to fight on. However, a similar battle on a neighbouring property has had a tragic outcome. George Bender fought a coal seam gas company for years, blaming it for polluting his property. But it turned out to be a battle of attrition he was never going to win.


Reporter: Michael Usher

Producer: Laura Sparkes

 

 

Midnight Oil drummer Rob Hirst has written a song with his daughter Jay O’Shea which has had more than half a million hits on the web.

The song The Truth Walks Slowly (In The Countryside) is about Queensland farmer George Bender who committed suicide last year following a protracted battle with a coal seam gas mining companies, which mined his family’s fertile farmland.

 

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/11/30/239AB3C400000578-2854556-image-12_1417314703186.jpg


 

Lyrics

 

Mr Rose the cattleman wont let the miners on his land
He says this land is more than me I’m married to the property
Six generations call this home and this is where I’ll rest my bones
Beyond the tablelands you’ll see a line of blurred infinity
The truth walks slowly in the old man’s eyes
The truth walks slowly in the countryside

(the up and down the here and now the why the what the when the how)

the truth walks slowly
I’ll sting and bite and scratch the hand of those who’d come and waste this land
Their eyes are void their hearts are blank as empty as my watertank
I know this country rock and stream my sweat has washed the mountain clean
Now I am forced to make a stand cos I’m the one who loves this land

The truth walks slowly convictions slide
The truth walks slowly ‘long the riverside
The truth walks slowly it smells like dirt
the truth walks slowly there’ll be no mining in our rich black earth

The truth walks slowly
seems our lives go flashing by like lightning
seems these times are compromised by fighting
seems these times will be defined by coal seam mining
The truth walks slowly but greed runs fast
There’ll be no mining in our
golden grass.

 

Rob: vocals/drums/strums
Rick Grossman: bass
Rob Woolf: piano/vocals
Jason Millhouse: guitars
Eden Cutler & Erin Pascoe: chant
Stephen Baker: chant
Recorded by Brent Clark

 


 

 

http://nnimgt-a.akamaihd.net/transform/v1/crop/frm/storypad-Gh2LLJN5ZAAiRUxkHxKdH7/2eff37c3-b077-454c-8690-27374862bb19.jpg/r0_0_1857_1044_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg